Literature DB >> 9344407

BIACORE analysis of histidine-tagged proteins using a chelating NTA sensor chip.

L Nieba1, S E Nieba-Axmann, A Persson, M Hämäläinen, F Edebratt, A Hansson, J Lidholm, K Magnusson, A F Karlsson, A Plückthun.   

Abstract

While BIACORE instruments are routinely used for kinetic measurements and for the determination of binding constants, the immobilization of a ligand onto the sensor chip surface has to be individually optimized for every system. We show here that the histidine (His) tag, routinely used in protein purification and in detection is an ideal tag for immobilization, despite the intrinsically low affinity between an immobilized metal ion and the His tag. This is due to strong rebinding effects caused by the high surface density of immobilized Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) on the chips used here. The immobilization of the ligand can be adjusted to a low level using the same chip, such that mass transport limitation and rebinding of the analyte to the immobilized ligand is minimal. Nine different proteins with different numbers of His tags were tested for stable binding to the Ni2+-NTA surface. Most proteins with one His tag dissociate very rapidly from the Ni2+-NTA surface, and the KD for the interaction between His tag and Ni2+-NTA was estimated to about 10(-6) m at neutral pH. In contrast, two His tags are usually found to be sufficient for stable binding. The kinetics of the chaperonin system of Escherichia coli GroEL and GroES were analyzed as a model using this system and found to be very similar to those obtained with covalently immobilized ligands. The sensor chip can be reused many times, because of the powerful regeneration methods. The ligand can be freshly immobilized after each cycle, thus eliminating potential denaturation upon regeneration as a source of error. Copyright 1997 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9344407     DOI: 10.1006/abio.1997.2326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  58 in total

1.  Enhanced protein delivery from photopolymerized hydrogels using a pseudospecific metal chelating ligand.

Authors:  Chien-Chi Lin; Andrew T Metters
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Peptide-based Biopolymers in Biomedicine and Biotechnology.

Authors:  Dominic Chow; Michelle L Nunalee; Dong Woo Lim; Andrew J Simnick; Ashutosh Chilkoti
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng R Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 36.214

3.  The use of amphipols as universal molecular adapters to immobilize membrane proteins onto solid supports.

Authors:  Delphine Charvolin; Jean-Baptiste Perez; Florent Rouvière; Fabrice Giusti; Paola Bazzacco; Alaa Abdine; Fabrice Rappaport; Karen L Martinez; Jean-Luc Popot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interactions between EB1 and microtubules: dramatic effect of affinity tags and evidence for cooperative behavior.

Authors:  Zhiqing C Zhu; Kamlesh K Gupta; Aranda R Slabbekoorn; Benjamin A Paulson; Eric S Folker; Holly V Goodson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Single-stranded DNA Binding by the Helix-Hairpin-Helix Domain of XPF Protein Contributes to the Substrate Specificity of the ERCC1-XPF Protein Complex.

Authors:  Devashish Das; Maryam Faridounnia; Lidija Kovacic; Robert Kaptein; Rolf Boelens; Gert E Folkers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Kinetics of Histidine-Tagged Protein Association to Nickel-Decorated Liposome Surfaces.

Authors:  Gokul Raghunath; R Brian Dyer
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Protein purification using PDZ affinity chromatography.

Authors:  Ward G Walkup; Mary B Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Protoc Protein Sci       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Design of supported membranes tethered via metal-affinity ligand-receptor pairs.

Authors:  U Rädler; J Mack; N Persike; G Jung; R Tampé
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Structural basis for binding specificity between subclasses of modular polyketide synthase docking domains.

Authors:  Tonia J Buchholz; Todd W Geders; Frank E Bartley; Kevin A Reynolds; Janet L Smith; David H Sherman
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Ligand-receptor interactions between surfaces: the role of binary polymer spacers.

Authors:  Gabriel S Longo; David H Thompson; I Szleifer
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.