Literature DB >> 9343796

Incorporating future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis: implications for the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertension.

M Johannesson1, D Meltzer, R M O'Conor.   

Abstract

It has been shown that the difference between consumption and production during life years gained should be included as a cost in cost-effectiveness analysis. In this study the authors estimate the impact of including these future costs on the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertension in Sweden. The cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained changes little among young men and women due to the addition of future costs, but increases by about $14,000 for middle-aged men and women and about $27,000 for older men and women. When future costs are not included, the cost per QALY gained is generally lowest among older men and women, but when future costs are included, the cost per QALY gained is generally lowest among middle-aged men and women. The authors conclude that the total resource consequences of changes in mortality should be routinely considered in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9343796     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  11 in total

1.  Predicting productivity based on EQ-5D: an explorative study.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Elly Stolk; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-06-13

2.  Estimating 'costs' for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Alec Miners
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost effectiveness of bisoprolol in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure in Sweden: analysis using data from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II trial.

Authors:  M Ekman; N Zethraeus; B Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Anders Oden; Frederik Borgstrom; Helena Johansson; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The lifetime cost effectiveness of amlodipine-based therapy plus atorvastatin compared with atenolol plus atorvastatin, amlodipine-based therapy alone and atenolol-based therapy alone: results from ASCOT1.

Authors:  Peter Lindgren; Martin Buxton; Thomas Kahan; Neil R Poulter; Björn Dahlöf; Peter S Sever; Hans Wedel; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The cost-effectiveness of the treatment of high risk women with osteoporosis, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in Sweden.

Authors:  N Zethraeus; O Ström; F Borgström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Cost-effectiveness of genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-infected patients with treatment failure.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Huldrych F Günthard; Mathew Simcock; Bruno Ledergerber; Jörg Schüpbach; Manuel Battegay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The economics of primary prevention of cardiovascular disease - a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  David Lb Schwappach; Till A Boluarte; Marc Suhrcke
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2007-05-14

9.  Perspective and Costing in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, 1974-2018.

Authors:  David D Kim; Madison C Silver; Natalia Kunst; Joshua T Cohen; Daniel A Ollendorf; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Including Future Consumption and Production in Economic Evaluation of Interventions that Save Life-Years: Commentary.

Authors:  Erik Nord; Christoffer Lamøy
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.