BACKGROUND: With widespread noncompliance to universal precautions well established, an experimental study was designed to compare the rate of universal precautions--related behaviors between nurses who participate in computer-assisted instruction. This study also explored the relationship between rates of universal precautions--related behaviors and subjects' demographic and experiential characteristics and history of occupational blood-borne exposure. METHODS: Data were collected by using a questionnaire to elicit information as to subjects' demographic and experiential characteristics and history of occupational blood-borne exposure. The Universal Precautions Assessment Tool was used to gather data on rates of universal precautions--related behaviors on two groups of registered nurses with 30 subjects per group. RESULTS: By using analysis of variance, the null hypothesis was rejected. The intervention used in this study did increase universal precautions--related behaviors. Multiple regression was used to analyze the research question and none of the variables were significant. Forty (67.8%) subjects reported receiving a needlestick or cut caused by a needle or sharp that was actually or potentially contaminated with blood or body fluids. Of these exposures, only one patient was known to be HIV antibody positive. CONCLUSION: Replication studies using computer-assisted instruction interventions are needed as are studies aimed at exploring other potentially effective interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: With widespread noncompliance to universal precautions well established, an experimental study was designed to compare the rate of universal precautions--related behaviors between nurses who participate in computer-assisted instruction. This study also explored the relationship between rates of universal precautions--related behaviors and subjects' demographic and experiential characteristics and history of occupational blood-borne exposure. METHODS: Data were collected by using a questionnaire to elicit information as to subjects' demographic and experiential characteristics and history of occupational blood-borne exposure. The Universal Precautions Assessment Tool was used to gather data on rates of universal precautions--related behaviors on two groups of registered nurses with 30 subjects per group. RESULTS: By using analysis of variance, the null hypothesis was rejected. The intervention used in this study did increase universal precautions--related behaviors. Multiple regression was used to analyze the research question and none of the variables were significant. Forty (67.8%) subjects reported receiving a needlestick or cut caused by a needle or sharp that was actually or potentially contaminated with blood or body fluids. Of these exposures, only one patient was known to be HIV antibody positive. CONCLUSION: Replication studies using computer-assisted instruction interventions are needed as are studies aimed at exploring other potentially effective interventions.
Authors: Christine E Cassidy; Margaret B Harrison; Christina Godfrey; Vera Nincic; Paul A Khan; Patricia Oakley; Amanda Ross-White; Hilary Grantmyre; Ian D Graham Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2021-12-04 Impact factor: 7.327