Literature DB >> 9342823

Influence of stocking density on some behavioural, physiological and productivity traits of broilers.

A Martrenchar1, J P Morisse, D Huonnic, J P Cotte.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the influence of stocking density on broiler welfare, 17,616 Ross chickens were assigned to three different treatments: T1, T2 and T3 with a final stocking density of 27, 35 and 43 kg/m2, respectively (corresponding to an initial density of 12, 16 and 20 birds/m2). Animal welfare was assessed by measuring behavioural, physiological and productivity traits. Behavioural observations included the disturbance frequency of resting birds by other birds, the duration of the lying bouts and the standing/lying ratio. The heterophil/lymphocyte ratios were assessed from blood collected before departure to the slaughterhouse. Main productivity traits were the final live weight and carcass degradation due to foot and pad dermatitis and breast blisters. Most of the observed parameters were adversely affected by the highest density (P < 0.05). Between T1 and T2, some traits tended to demonstrate that a better degree of bird welfare existed in T1 (higher standing/lying postures ratio and final live weight, lower frequency of pododermatitis and hock lesions; P < 0.05) whereas other traits showed no differences (frequency of disturbances by other birds during resting, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio). In conclusion, a stocking density of 43 kg/m2 seemed to induce poor bird welfare whereas it was not clearly demonstrated that 27 kg/m2 was better than 35 kg/m2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res        ISSN: 0928-4249            Impact factor:   3.683


  8 in total

1.  Differences and variation in welfare performance of broiler flocks in three production systems.

Authors:  Ingrid C de Jong; Bram Bos; Jan van Harn; Pim Mostert; Dennis Te Beest
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Evaluating the effects of stocking density on the behavior, health, and welfare of turkey hens to 11 weeks of age.

Authors:  S Jhetam; K Buchynski; T Shynkaruk; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Effects of stock density on the laying performance, blood parameter, corticosterone, litter quality, gas emission and bone mineral density of laying hens in floor pens.

Authors:  H K Kang; S B Park; S H Kim; C H Kim
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Comparisons of management practices and farm design on Australian commercial layer and meat chicken farms: Cage, barn and free range.

Authors:  Angela Bullanday Scott; Mini Singh; Jenny-Ann Toribio; Marta Hernandez-Jover; Belinda Barnes; Kathryn Glass; Barbara Moloney; Amanda Lee; Peter Groves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing the Effects of Stocking Density on Turkey Tom Health and Welfare to 16 Weeks of Age.

Authors:  Kailyn Beaulac; Karen Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-09-04

6.  Effects of lysine biomass supplementation on growth performance and clinical indicators in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Julianna C Jespersen; Susann Richert; Juliano Cesar de Paula Dorigam; Maci L Oelschlager; Ryan N Dilger
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Stocking density effects on turkey hen performance to 11 weeks of age.

Authors:  S Jhetam; K Buchynski; T Shynkaruk; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  Differences in performance, body conformation, and welfare of conventional and slow-growing broiler chickens raised at 2 stocking densities.

Authors:  S L Weimer; A Mauromoustakos; D M Karcher; M A Erasmus
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.