Literature DB >> 9342689

Assessment of cognitive deterioration in individual patients following cardiac surgery: correcting for measurement error and practice effects.

E F Bruggemans1, F J Van de Vijver, H A Huysmans.   

Abstract

Assessment of cognitive change in individual patients may be confounded by unreliability of test scores and effects of repeated testing. An index correcting for both problems is proposed and compared with change indices that do not or do not adequately deal with measurement error and practice effects. These indices were used to examine cognitive deterioration in a sample of 63 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It was demonstrated that for test measures with a low reliability, failure to correct for measurement error resulted in overestimation of deterioration rates. For test measures with a high reliability, but showing substantial practice effects, failure to correct for practice effects resulted in underestimation of deterioration rates. With the proposed index, cognitive deterioration shortly after cardiac surgery was most frequently observed for attention and psychomotor speed, less frequently for verbal fluency, and only occasionally for learning and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342689     DOI: 10.1080/01688639708403743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  11 in total

1.  Statistical procedures for determining the extent of cognitive change following concussion.

Authors:  A Collie; P Maruff; M Makdissi; M McStephen; D G Darby; P McCrory
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Predicting cognitive change within domains.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; David J Moser; Jane S Paulsen
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 3.  Reliable change assessment in sport concussion research: a comment on the proposal and reviews of Collie et al.

Authors:  G H Maassen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Predicting cognitive change in older adults: the relative contribution of practice effects.

Authors:  Kevin Duff; Leigh J Beglinger; David J Moser; Jane S Paulsen; Susan K Schultz; Stephan Arndt
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  An Evaluation of the Consistency and Reliability of the Defense Automated Neurocognitive Assessment Tool.

Authors:  C R Russo; C E Lathan
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-03-24

6.  Use of an automated mobile application to assess effects of nicotine withdrawal on verbal fluency: A pilot study.

Authors:  Serguei V S Pakhomov; Wrenda Teeple; Anne M Mills; Michael Kotlyar
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Cognitive dysfunction after cardiac surgery: Pathophysiological mechanisms and preventive strategies.

Authors:  E F Bruggemans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Online Self-Administered Cognitive Testing Using the Amsterdam Cognition Scan: Establishing Psychometric Properties and Normative Data.

Authors:  Heleen Em Feenstra; Ivar E Vermeulen; Jaap Mj Murre; Sanne B Schagen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  UCancellation: A new mobile measure of selective attention and concentration.

Authors:  Anja Pahor; Randy E Mester; Audrey A Carrillo; Eunice Ghil; Jason F Reimer; Susanne M Jaeggi; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 10.  Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; John Devin Peipert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.