Literature DB >> 9342447

Pharmacokinetics of oral morphine sulfate in dogs: a comparison of sustained release and conventional formulations.

S E Dohoo1, R A Tasker.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability (F) of single dose sustained release morphine sulfate (OSRMS) and nonsustained release morphine sulfate (NSRMS) were compared to each other and to a bolus injection of morphine sulfate (MS) intravenously (i.v.) in dogs. Beagles (n = 6) were randomly assigned to 3 treatment groups: namely, OSRMS 15 mg orally, NSRMS 15 mg orally, and 15 mg i.v. Serum samples were drawn at intervals up to 480 min following oral and 420 min following i.v. administration. Serum was analysed for morphine concentration using a radioimmunoassay. Data were analysed using non-compartmental pharmacokinetics. The only statistically significant difference between OSRMS and NSRMS was maximum serum concentration (Cmax). There were trends toward longer time to maximum serum concentration (Tmax) and longer mean absorption time (MAT) for OSRMS when compared to NSRMS, but the differences were not statistically significant (P < 0.05). Pharmacokinetic parameters for both oral formulations exhibited large variability in the rate of absorption of MS from the gastrointestinal tract. Bioavailability of both OSRMS and NSRMS was low (15%-17%). As expected, the area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) and Cmax for the i.v. data was significantly greater than for both oral groups, and Tmax and mean residence time (MRT) were significantly less following i.v. administration. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 treatment groups for apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) or elimination parameters. The OSRMS formulation used in this study provided equivalent bioavailability to NSRMS in dogs, accompanied by large individual variability in drug absorption. It also did not appear that the sustained release formulation provided sufficiently prolonged release of morphine sulfate from the tablet matrix in dogs to allow prolonged dosing intervals compared to NSRMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342447      PMCID: PMC1189417     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  8 in total

1.  Steady-state pharmacokinetics of oral sustained-release morphine sulphate in dogs.

Authors:  S Dohoo
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.786

Review 2.  Treating moderate and severe pain in small animals.

Authors:  N Brock
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Morphine-3-glucuronide may functionally antagonize morphine-6-glucuronide induced antinociception and ventilatory depression in the rat.

Authors:  Gong Qian-Ling; Jan Hedner; Roland Björkman; Thomas Hedner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Analgesic effect of morphine glucuronides.

Authors:  K Shimomura; O Kamata; S Ueki; S Ida; K Oguri; H Yoshimura; H Tsukamoto
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  The relief of pain in laboratory animals.

Authors:  P A Flecknell
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.471

6.  Pharmacokinetics of parenteral and oral sustained-release morphine sulphate in dogs.

Authors:  S Dohoo; R A Tasker; A Donald
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.786

7.  Morphine and metabolite behavior after different routes of morphine administration: demonstration of the importance of the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide.

Authors:  R Osborne; S Joel; D Trew; M Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  The effect of halothane on morphine disposition: relative contributions of the liver and kidney to morphine glucuronidation in the dog.

Authors:  W J Merrell; L Gordon; A J Wood; S Shay; E K Jackson; M Wood
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  A mathematical relationship for hydromorphone loading into liposomes with trans-membrane ammonium sulfate gradients.

Authors:  Sheng Tu; Tamara McGinnis; Lisa Krugner-Higby; Timothy D Heath
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.534

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.