Literature DB >> 9339986

Facial nerve function after parotidectomy.

L P Bron1, C J O'Brien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the incidence of facial nerve dysfunction following parotidectomy and to correlate this with the extent of parotid gland resection, the pathological diagnosis, and the clinical setting.
DESIGN: A review of prospectively collected data from a dedicated computerized head and neck database.
SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Between 1987 and 1995, 248 patients underwent 259 parotidectomies performed by the same surgeon (C.J.O'B.). Indications were clinical tumor (n=213) or sialadenitis (n=46). There were 235 previously untreated patients and 13 who had undergone a prior operation on that side. Facial nerve function was normal in 242 patients and abnormal before surgery in 6. Cancers accounted for 88 parotidectomies and benign disease accounted for 171. Of 213 clinical tumors, 41 (19%) were situated deep to the plane of the facial nerve.
RESULTS: The facial nerve was intentionally sacrificed in 28 of 259 operations (18 total and 10 partial sacrifice). In 230 parotidectomies in which facial nerve function was normal before surgery and the nerve was preserved, the incidence of initial postoperative facial weakness was 29%. Based on the diagnosis and extent of surgery, rates of facial weakness were 16.5% and 13%, respectively, for benign and malignant tumors located in the superficial lobe and treated with limited superficial parotidectomy; 30% and 34% for sialadenitis treated with complete superficial parotidectomy and near-total parotidectomy, respectively; 31% and 100%, respectively, for benign and malignant lobe tumors treated with near-total parotidectomy; 83% for parotidectomy associated with a neck dissection; and 33% for patients who had previous parotid surgery. Permanent weakness occurred in 13 (5.6%) of 230 patients, but 10 of these 13 had simultaneous neck dissection and facial nerve dysfunction involved only the marginal mandibular branch. Recovery of normal facial movements occurred within 6 months in 46 (68%) of 67 of those with initial weakness.
CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of temporary facial weakness correlated with the extent of surgery and was especially influenced by tumor location deep to the plane of the facial nerve, previous parotid surgery, a diagnosis of sialadenitis, and the addition of neck dissection to the parotidectomy. Permanent weakness mainly affected the marginal mandibular branch when neck dissection was included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339986     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900100065009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  29 in total

1.  The ability to identify the intraparotid facial nerve for locating parotid gland lesions in comparison to other indirect landmark methods: evaluation by 3.0 T MR imaging with surface coils.

Authors:  Mana Ishibashi; Shinya Fujii; Katsuyuki Kawamoto; Keisuke Nishihara; Eiji Matsusue; Kazuhiko Kodani; Toshio Kaminou; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Classification of parotidectomies: a proposal of the European Salivary Gland Society.

Authors:  M Quer; O Guntinas-Lichius; F Marchal; V Vander Poorten; D Chevalier; X León; D Eisele; P Dulguerov
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Landmarks of the facial nerve: implications for parotidectomy.

Authors:  N Pather; M Osman
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Electrophysiological assessment of a peptide amphiphile nanofiber nerve graft for facial nerve repair.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Greene; Mark T McClendon; Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Zaida Álvarez; Samuel I Stupp; Claus-Peter Richter
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.963

5.  Histopathologic and functional effects of facial nerve following electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Emrah Sapmaz; Irfan Kaygusuz; Hayrettin Cengiz Alpay; Nusret Akpolat; Erol Keles; Turgut Karlidag; Israfil Orhan; Sinasi Yalcin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The rate of facial nerve dysfunction and time to recovery after intraparotid and extraparotid facial nerve exposure and protection in head and neck cutaneous tumor surgery.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Nakamura; Yukiko Teramoto; Yuri Asami; Taichi Imamura; Sayuri Sato; Ryota Tanaka; Hiroshi Maruyama; Yoshiyuki Nakamura; Yasuhiro Fujisawa; Manabu Fujimoto; Akifumi Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Facial nerve dysfunction after superficial parotidectomy with or without continuous intraoperative electromyographic neuromonitoring: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Agnaldo J Graciano; Carlos A Fischer; Guilherme V Coelho; José H Steck; Jorge R Paschoal; Carlos T Chone
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Identification of facial nerve during parotidectomy: a combined anatomical & surgical study.

Authors:  Somnath Saha; Sudipta Pal; Moushumi Sengupta; Kanishka Chowdhury; Vedula Padmini Saha; Lopamudra Mondal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-07-24

9.  Use of steroids for facial nerve paralysis after parotidectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kiran Varadharajan; Issa Beegun; Niall Daly
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 10.  Contemporary management of tumors of the salivary glands.

Authors:  Joseph M Scianna; Guy J Petruzzelli
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.