Literature DB >> 9339947

Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated with characteristic aluminum K and copper L ultrasoft X rays.

S W Botchway1, D L Stevens, M A Hill, T J Jenner, P O'Neill.   

Abstract

Characteristic aluminum K (AlK) (energy of 1.5 keV) and copper L (CuL) (energy of approximately 0.96 keV) ultrasoft X rays have been used to investigate the effectiveness of the numerous low-energy secondary electrons produced by low-linear energy transfer (LET) ionizing radiation. Cellular inactivation and induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated as monolayers with these ultrasoft X radiations have been studied under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The mean cell thickness, determined by confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy, was used to calculate the mean dose to the nucleus of the irradiated cells. Relative to 60Co gamma rays, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for cellular inactivation at 10% survival is 1.7 +/- 0.1 and 2.3 +/- 0.3 for AIK and CuL ultrasoft X rays, respectively. The RBE values for induction of DSBs of 2.5 +/- 0.2 and 3.0 +/- 0.3 for AlK and CuL X rays, respectively, were determined after irradiation at 277 K using the technique of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Induction of DSBs is linearly dependent on dose. Oxygen enhancement ratios of 1.9 and 2.1 for cellular inactivation and DSB induction, respectively, were obtained with AIK X rays. These values are less than those for 60Co gamma radiation. The repair kinetics for rejoining of DSBs after a dose of 15 Gy is similar for both X-ray energies and 60Co gamma rays with a first half-life of 18-22 +/- 5 min. From these studies, it is suggested that induction of DSBs by low-LET radiations such as 60Co gamma rays reflects clustered damage produced predominantly by low-energy electron "track ends," which represent about 30% of the total dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  16 in total

1.  Estimated yield of double-strand breaks from internal exposure to tritium.

Authors:  Jing Chen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Clustered DNA damage induced by gamma radiation in human fibroblasts (HF19), hamster (V79-4) cells and plasmid DNA is revealed as Fpg and Nth sensitive sites.

Authors:  Melanie Gulston; Jonathan Fulford; Terry Jenner; Catherine de Lara; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Mixed secondary chromatin structure revealed by modeling radiation-induced DNA fragment length distribution.

Authors:  Wenzong Ma; Chenyang Gu; Lin Ma; Caoqi Fan; Chao Zhang; Yujie Sun; Cheng Li; Gen Yang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  The dynamics of Ku70/80 and DNA-PKcs at DSBs induced by ionizing radiation is dependent on the complexity of damage.

Authors:  Pamela Reynolds; Jennifer A Anderson; Jane V Harper; Mark A Hill; Stanley W Botchway; Anthony W Parker; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Induction and Processing of the Radiation-Induced Gamma-H2AX Signal and Its Link to the Underlying Pattern of DSB: A Combined Experimental and Modelling Study.

Authors:  Francesco Tommasino; Thomas Friedrich; Burkhard Jakob; Barbara Meyer; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Disruption of PARP1 function inhibits base excision repair of a sub-set of DNA lesions.

Authors:  Pamela Reynolds; Sarah Cooper; Martine Lomax; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  A kinetic-based model of radiation-induced intercellular signalling.

Authors:  Stephen J McMahon; Karl T Butterworth; Colman Trainor; Conor K McGarry; Joe M O'Sullivan; Giuseppe Schettino; Alan R Hounsell; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gap junction communication dynamics and bystander effects from ultrasoft X-rays.

Authors:  G O Edwards; S W Botchway; G Hirst; C W Wharton; J K Chipman; R A Meldrum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Modeling damage complexity-dependent non-homologous end-joining repair pathway.

Authors:  Yongfeng Li; Pamela Reynolds; Peter O'Neill; Francis A Cucinotta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of DNA repair proteins following laser microbeam induced DNA damage - when is a DSB not a DSB?

Authors:  Pamela Reynolds; Stanley W Botchway; Anthony W Parker; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.