Literature DB >> 9339929

Routine pulmonary artery catheterization does not reduce morbidity and mortality of elective vascular surgery: results of a prospective, randomized trial.

J S Bender1, M A Smith-Meek, C E Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined whether the preoperative placement of a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) with optimization of hemodynamics results in outcome improvement after elective vascular surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The PAC commonly is used not only in patients who are critically ill, but also perioperatively in major elective surgery. Few prospective studies exist documenting its usefulness.
METHODS: One hundred four consecutive patients were randomized to have a PAC placed the morning of operation (group I) or to have a PAC placed only if clinically indicated (group II). Group I patients were resuscitated to preestablished endpoints before surgery and kept at these points both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Group II patients received standard care.
RESULTS: There was one death in each group. An intraoperative or postoperative complication developed in 13 patients in group I versus 7 patients in group II (p = not significant). Group I patients received more fluid than did group II patients (5137 +/- 315 mL vs. 3789 +/- 306 mL; p < 0.003). There was no significant difference in either overall or surgical intensive care unit length of stay. Only one patient in group II required a postoperative PAC.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine PAC use in elective vascular surgery increases the volume of fluid given to patients without demonstrable improvement in morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339929      PMCID: PMC1191013          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative assessment of high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  J A Savino; L R Del Guercio
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  The role of physiologic monitoring in patients with fractures of the hip.

Authors:  R J Schultz; G F Whitfield; J J LaMura; A Raciti; S Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1985-04

3.  Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  W C Shoemaker; P L Appel; H B Kram; K Waxman; T S Lee
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Use of the pulmonary artery catheter to reduce operative complications.

Authors:  J E Sola; J S Bender
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Preoperative optimization of cardiovascular hemodynamics improves outcome in peripheral vascular surgery. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J F Berlauk; J H Abrams; I J Gilmour; S R O'Connor; D R Knighton; F B Cerra
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Clinical evaluation compared to pulmonary artery catheterization in the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients.

Authors:  P R Eisenberg; A S Jaffe; D P Schuster
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  A F Connors; T Speroff; N V Dawson; C Thomas; F E Harrell; D Wagner; N Desbiens; L Goldman; A W Wu; R M Califf; W J Fulkerson; H Vidaillet; S Broste; P Bellamy; J Lynn; W A Knaus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk of noncardiac operation in patients with defined coronary disease: The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry experience.

Authors:  E D Foster; K B Davis; J A Carpenter; S Abele; D Fray
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Reinfarction following anesthesia in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T L Rao; K H Jacobs; A A El-Etr
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Hemodynamic and oxygen transport patterns in surviving and nonsurviving postoperative patients.

Authors:  R D Bland; W C Shoemaker; E Abraham; J C Cobo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  31 in total

1.  A computer program for interpreting pulmonary artery catheterization data: results of the European HEMODYN Resident Study.

Authors:  Pierre Squara; Etienne Fourquet; Luc Jacquet; Alain Broccard; Thomas Uhlig; Andrew Rhodes; Jan Bakker; Claude Perret
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Our study 20 years on: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of deliberate perioperative increase of oxygen delivery on mortality in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  Owen Boyd; R Michael Grounds
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mansoor N Bangash; Ming-Li Kong; Rupert M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Feng Dai; Alexandria Brackett; Yuhang Ai; Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in cardiac and vascular surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariateresa Giglio; Lidia Dalfino; Filomena Puntillo; Giovanni Rubino; Massimo Marucci; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-24

9.  Swan-Ganz catheter use in trauma patients can be reduced without negatively affecting outcomes.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Kenji Inaba; Chrysanthos Georgiou; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Linda S Chan; Demetrios Demetriades; Randall Friese; Peter Rhee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Jenica Upshaw; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.