Literature DB >> 9339282

A comparison of methodologies for the preparation of human epidermal-dermal composites.

M M Ghosh1, S Boyce, C Layton, E Freedlander, S Mac Neil.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare methodologies for the preparation of human skin composites based on deepidermized acellular dermal matrix, epidermal keratinocytes, and dermal fibroblasts with the aim of preparing a clinically useful skin substitute. Dermal matrices were prepared from normal human skin and we compared methods of sterilization (glycerol treatment, ethylene oxide treatment, and gamma irradiation), methods of removing the epidermis (sodium chloride, phosphate buffered saline, and dispase), and methods of seeding the composites with fibroblasts and keratinocytes. We report protocols for reproducibly preparing composites that share many of the features of normal skin after 7 days culture at an air-liquid interface. Such composites can be based on allodermis pretreated with either glycerol or ethylene oxide (although the latter gave less consistent results than the glycerol treatment). Fibroblast penetration into the dermis could be achieved by culture of cells on the reticular or papillary surface of the dermis. However, we report for the first time that fibroblast entry from the papillary surface only occurred when keratinocytes were also present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339282     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199710000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  8 in total

1.  The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: acute phase.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahrokhi; Anna Arno; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Demonstrating the Potential of Using Bio-Based Sustainable Polyester Blends for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  David H Ramos-Rodriguez; Samand Pashneh-Tala; Amanpreet Kaur Bains; Robert D Moorehead; Nikolaos Kassos; Adrian L Kelly; Thomas E Paterson; C Amnael Orozco-Diaz; Andrew A Gill; Ilida Ortega Asencio
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 3.  Tissue Engineering: Step Ahead in Maxillofacial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Raj Rai; Rushik Raval; Rakshit Vijay Sinai Khandeparker; Swati K Chidrawar; Abdul Ahad Khan; Makne Sachin Ganpat
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-09

4.  In vitro skin models to study epithelial regeneration from the hair follicle.

Authors:  Nkemcho Ojeh; Baki Akgül; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Mike Philpott; Harshad Navsaria
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Overcoming scarring in the urethra: Challenges for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Reem Aldamanhori; Christopher R Chapple; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12

6.  Bioengineering Vascular Networks to Study Angiogenesis and Vascularization of Physiologically Relevant Tissue Models in Vitro.

Authors:  Serkan Dikici; Frederik Claeyssens; Sheila MacNeil
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Evaluation of the Use of Nerve Allograft Preserved in Glycerol.

Authors:  João Carlos Nakamoto; Erick Yoshio Wataya; Hugo Alberto Nakamoto; Gustavo Bispo Santos; Ivan Ribaric; Ana K A Herrera; José C M Faria
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 8.  Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo.

Authors:  Delphine Antoni; Hélène Burckel; Elodie Josset; Georges Noel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.