Literature DB >> 9339095

A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.

H Y Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dinoprostone, is presently used in our standard protocol for cervical ripening and labour induction. In search for a cheaper alternative, misoprostol has been found to be a good substitute. In view of the potential saving it might offer, we set out to test its efficacy against the standard dinoprostone.
METHODS: A randomised double-blind study involving 50 pregnant women with prolonged pregnancy, treated at a government hospital in Malaysia, was carried out. Two hundred micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol were compared with 3 mg of dinoprostone in each treatment arm.
RESULTS: In the misoprostol group, labour was successfully established in 92% of cases compared to 64% in the dinoprostone group (p = 0.04). The induction-delivery interval was shorter with more women delivering within 12 hours (72% vs 28%, p = 0.047). Maternal and neonatal complications, mode of delivery, the need for oxytocin and pethidine were quite similar statistically. Polysystole was more frequent (28% vs 12%, p = 0.28) in the misoprostol group but it was not associated with fetal distress.
CONCLUSION: The study showed that misoprostol was a more effective drug in labour induction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asia; Biology; Cervical Effects; Cervix; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Delivery; Demographic Factors; Developing Countries; Endocrine System; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Malaysia; Misoprostol--administraction and dosage; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcomes; Pregnancy, Prolonged; Pregnant Women; Prostaglandins; Prostaglandins, Synthetic--administraction and dosage; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Southeastern Asia; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9339095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  4 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Cynthia Pileggi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

Review 2.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 4.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.