Literature DB >> 9338905

Combined general and epidural anesthesia versus general anesthesia for major abdominal surgery: postanesthesia recovery characteristics.

G H Handley1, B S Silbert, P H Mooney, S A Schweitzer, N B Allen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Outcome studies comparing general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia (GEN-EPI) to general anesthesia (GEN) for major abdominal surgery have been equivocal. However, many believe that patients anesthetized with GEN-EPI fair better than GEN. This study tests the hypothesis that there are favorable recovery characteristics associated with GEN-EPI as compared with GEN following abdominal surgery.
METHODS: A prospective randomized double-blind trial, consisting of 30 patients ages 18-74 undergoing abdominal surgery was undertaken. Patients received either GEN-EPI or GEN by standardized protocol. At the end of surgery the epidural catheter was removed and psychological testing was performed over 24 hours to determine recovery characteristics. These included the modified Slater test, the Self-Assessment Manikin, the Kendrick Digital Copying Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, as well as visual analog scales for pain and appearance.
RESULTS: Patients receiving GEN-EPI emerged from anesthesia faster (P < .03) with less pain on awakening (P < .04 at rest; P < .01 on coughing), had better psychomotor function at 2 hours (P < .04), and were less drowsy at 4 hours (P < .04), than patients with GEN. There was no difference in pain intensity after the initial assessment, morphine usage, mood, anxiety, and depression at any other measurement period.
CONCLUSION: Transient quantifiable differences in recovery characteristics exist between patients receiving GEN-EPI and GEN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9338905     DOI: 10.1016/s1098-7339(97)80030-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth        ISSN: 0146-521X


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Preemptive analgesia and local anesthesia as a supplement to general anesthesia: a review.

Authors:  Eliezer Kaufman; Joel B Epstein; Meir Gorsky; Douglass L Jackson; Avishag Kadari
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2005

3.  Regional Anaesthesia Techniques for Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  K C Khanduri
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Randomised, masked study of local anaesthesia administered prior to external dacryocystorhinostomy under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Richard L Scawn; Matthew J Allen; Geoffrey E Rose; David H Verity
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

6.  Anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy perfusion.

Authors:  Christoph Kerscher; Michael Ried; Hans-Stefan Hofmann; Bernhard M Graf; York A Zausig
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.