Literature DB >> 9338102

Maintaining genetic stability through TP53 mediated checkpoint control.

G M Wahl1, S P Linke, T G Paulson, L C Huang.   

Abstract

TP53 serves as a key relay for signals elicited by cellular stresses arising from diverse environmental or therapeutic insults. This relay then activates a cell cycle arrest or cell death program, depending on the stimulus and cell type. The absence of TP53 function disables the cell death or arrest programmes, thereby allowing the emergence of variants with various types of genomic alterations. The data discussed focus on two different types of signals that trigger the TP53 relay system. Firstly, TP53 arrests cell cycle progression in response to the types of DNA damage most commonly detected in cells undergoing tumour progression. Secondly, TP53 is activated by specific depletion of ribonucleotide pools, which prevent cells from entering S phase under conditions that could lead to chromosome breakage. The contribution of both responses limits the emergence of genetic variants. The DNA damage induced arrest appears to be triggered by as few as one double strand break in normal human fibroblasts. Analysis of the arrest kinetics after ionizing radiation shows that TP53 activates a prolonged arrest response in cells with irreparable DNA damage and that high efficiency cell elimination is achieved by a process that can be activated over multiple cell cycles. These data indicate that the primary function of the TP53 arrest/apoptosis pathway in response to double strand break is to eliminate damaged cells from the proliferating population, not to allow additional time for lesion repair. However, it remains possible that repair of other types of damage may benefit from TP53 mediated arrest. Analyses in model genetic systems indicate that the absence of TP53 function allows, but does not ensure, a high intrinsic rate of genetic variation and that instability is increased substantially when cells proceed through S phase under inappropriate growth conditions. This implies that inactivation of TP53 function in combination with other genetic alterations, such as oncogene activation, could accelerate genomic instability and tumour progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9338102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Surv        ISSN: 0261-2429


  28 in total

1.  A leucine-rich nuclear export signal in the p53 tetramerization domain: regulation of subcellular localization and p53 activity by NES masking.

Authors:  J M Stommel; N D Marchenko; G S Jimenez; U M Moll; T J Hope; G M Wahl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Combination therapy for autoimmune diseases: the rheumatoid arthritis model.

Authors:  N Fathy; D E Furst
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001

3.  Integrity of the N-terminal transcription domain of p53 is required for mutant p53 interference with drug-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  D Matas; A Sigal; P Stambolsky; M Milyavsky; L Weisz; D Schwartz; N Goldfinger; V Rotter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Expression Profiling of Hspb1 and Tp53 Genes through RT-qPCR in Different Cancer Types of Canis familiaris.

Authors:  Rashid Saif; Ali Raza Awan; Muhammad Tayyab; Masroor Ellahi Babar; Asim Khalid Mahmood; Asim Khalid Mahmood; Zia Ullah; Saeeda Zia; Muhammad Wasim
Journal:  Iran J Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Inactivation of p53 by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 Tax requires activation of the NF-kappaB pathway and is dependent on p53 phosphorylation.

Authors:  C A Pise-Masison; R Mahieux; H Jiang; M Ashcroft; M Radonovich; J Duvall; C Guillerm; J N Brady
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Complex cisplatin-double strand break (DSB) lesions directly impair cellular non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) independent of downstream damage response (DDR) pathways.

Authors:  Catherine R Sears; John J Turchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Drosophila p53 preserves genomic stability by regulating cell death.

Authors:  Naoko Sogame; Misoo Kim; John M Abrams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A plausible model for the digital response of p53 to DNA damage.

Authors:  Lan Ma; John Wagner; John Jeremy Rice; Wenwei Hu; Arnold J Levine; Gustavo A Stolovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Edward Sausville; Patricia Lorusso; Michael Carducci; Judith Carter; Mary F Quinn; Lisa Malburg; Nilofer Azad; David Cosgrove; Richard Knight; Peter Barker; Sonya Zabludoff; Felix Agbo; Patricia Oakes; Adrian Senderowicz
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  A p53-dependent S-phase checkpoint helps to protect cells from DNA damage in response to starvation for pyrimidine nucleotides.

Authors:  M L Agarwal; A Agarwal; W R Taylor; O Chernova; Y Sharma; G R Stark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.