Literature DB >> 9337687

The U.S. pediatric cancer clinical trials programmes: international implications and the way forward.

W A Bleyer1.   

Abstract

The four national paediatric cancer clinical trials organisations in the United States--the Children's Cancer Group, the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group--were formed in 1955, 1969, 1972 and 1979, respectively. Together, the Children's Cancer Group and Pediatric Oncology Group serve as a national registry of nearly all childhood cancers in the United States, provide a national network of communication for researchers, care providers and families of paediatric patients with malignant disease and conduct laboratory investigations and clinical trials of new treatments of cancers in infants, children, adolescents and young adults. Nearly 95% of patients with cancer in the United States who are below 15 years of age are registered by the Children's Cancer Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group and more than half of American children with cancer are entered into at least one trial by a paediatric group. Improved survival of children receiving treatment according to well-defined protocols in specialised children's centres, in contrast to children who received treatment outside of these centres, has been shown for those with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, lymphoma, Wilms' tumour, medulloblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. By the year 2000, the overall cure rate for United States children and adolescents with cancer should exceed 85%. To reach this goal, the way forward will depend on international collaboration, implementation of global harmonisation, prevention of the erosion of biomedical research and clinical trials by the managed health care industry, increased public and private financial support and continued recruitment into paediatric oncology of brilliant and dedicated young investigators. The specific challenges ahead include: (1) transferring the knowledge, methodologies and technologies to countries that are less fortunate; (2) conducting multinational clinical trials in conjunction with paediatric cooperative groups in other countries; (3) accessing older adolescent patients who currently do not participate in cooperative group trials; (4) merging clinical trials by adult collaborative groups that overlap with the paediatric groups, as in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, acute myelogenous leukaemia, Hodgkin's disease, osteosarcoma and germ cell tumours; (5) establishing a stable source of funding for national and international cooperative paediatric cancer clinical trials; (6) creating an informatics system that can link paediatric cooperative group operation centres around the world, and the institutions within each collaborative group; and (7) securing the support of the insurance industry and government in covering clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337687     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00249-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  26 in total

1.  Why are children with cancer being exposed to complementary medicine?

Authors:  S F Whitsett; R Anderson; M J Coppes
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-09

2.  Rationale and methods for site selection for a trial using a novel intervention to treat stimulant abuse.

Authors:  Diane Warden; Madhukar H Trivedi; Tracy L Greer; Edward Nunes; Bruce D Grannemann; Viviana E Horigian; Eugene Somoza; Kolette Ring; Tiffany Kyle; José Szapocznik
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Understanding clinical trials in childhood cancer.

Authors:  Mason C Bond; Sheila Pritchard
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Barriers and challenges to global clinical cancer research.

Authors:  Bostjan Seruga; Aleksander Sadikov; Eduardo L Cazap; Lucia Beatriz Delgado; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Natasha B Leighl; Mohamed M Meshref; Hironobu Minami; Eliezer Robinson; Nise Hitomi Yamaguchi; Doug Pyle; Tanja Cufer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-12-09

Review 5.  Recent advances: oncology.

Authors:  M H Tattersall; H Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-13

6.  Bioconversion of pinoresinol into matairesinol by use of recombinant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Han-Jung Kuo; Zhi-Yu Wei; Pei-Chun Lu; Pung-Ling Huang; Kung-Ta Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Chemotherapy drug shortages in pediatric oncology: a consensus statement.

Authors:  Matthew Decamp; Steven Joffe; Conrad V Fernandez; Ruth R Faden; Yoram Unguru
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  Issues and challenges in palliative care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Friedman; Joanne M Hilden; Kristen Powaski
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-08

9.  Issues and challenges in palliative care for children with cancer.

Authors:  Debra L Friedman; Joanne M Hilden; Kristen Powaski
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 10.  Factors in improved survival from paediatric cancer.

Authors:  J W Taub
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.