Literature DB >> 9337677

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of interferon as adjuvant therapy in high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma.

A Messori1, P Becagli, S Trippoli, E Tendi.   

Abstract

To assess the cost per life year gained of alpha interferon (IFN) as adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk resected melanoma, we conducted a retrospective, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis on clinical data from a previously published ECOG trial [9]. The Gompertz model was used to estimate the total lifetime values of patient-years of subjects receiving IFN in comparison with subjects given no adjuvant treatment. The ECOG trial involved 143 patients treated with high-dose IFN and 137 given no adjuvant treatment. Estimated drug expenditures were based on the assumption of a cost of $109.25 per 10 MU of IFN. Our analysis of the ECOG results showed that the adjuvant treatment of 100 subjects with high-dose IFN improved survival expectancy by 133.6 discounted life years or 308 undiscounted life years. The use of IFN (compared with no adjuvant treatment) implied an incremental cost of $16,467 per discounted life year saved (95% CI of $4752-50,000) or $7143 per undiscounted life year saved (95% CI of $3226-33,846). Sensitivity testing, in which variations were introduced in the main factors influencing cost and effectiveness, showed that this value always remained below $50,000. Our pharmacoeconomic analysis indicates that adjuvant treatment with high-dose IFN in patients with high-risk resected melanoma implies a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio. Because two other studies showed no significant survival benefit in patients receiving adjuvant IFN at lower values of total dose per patient, the controversy remains and confirmation data are needed for the ECOG trial's results. If these clinical results are confirmed, our analysis shows that the dosage of IFN given in this trial has a favourable pharmacoeconomic profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337677     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00413-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

1.  Discounting health effects in pharmacoeconomic evaluations: current controversies.

Authors:  J M Bos; Maarten J Postma; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  [Health economics studies in dermatology].

Authors:  C Rogalski; J Simon; U Paasch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  Current controversies in the application of meta-analysis (with special reference to oncological treatments)

Authors:  A Messori
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1997-06

4.  Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci.

Authors:  A Messori; S Trippoli; P Becagli; G Zaccara
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Drug Treatments for Advanced Melanoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Darío Rubio-Rodríguez; Silvia De Diego Blanco; Maite Pérez; Carlos Rubio-Terrés
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Cost effectiveness and cost utility of adjuvant interferon alpha in cutaneous melanoma: a review.

Authors:  Ralph Crott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Feasibility of Pegylated Interferon in Children and Young Adults With Resected High-Risk Melanoma.

Authors:  Fariba Navid; Cynthia E Herzog; John Sandoval; Vinay M Daryani; Clinton F Stewart; Jami Gattuso; Belinda Mandrell; Sean Phipps; Wassim Chemaitilly; April Sykes; Andrew M Davidoff; Barry L Shulkin; Armita Bahrami; Wayne L Furman; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Deborah Schiff; Bhaskar Rao; Alberto Pappo
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.