| Literature DB >> 9337359 |
F Adnet1, F Lapostolle, S W Borron, B Hennequin, G Leclercq, M Fleury.
Abstract
Two methods of endotracheal intubation of patients lying on the ground were compared for ease and speed of intubation and minimization of complications in a crossover study of prehospital-oriented emergency physicians. Intubation of a mannequin was attempted by the physicians in either a left lateral decubitus (LLD) position or a kneeling (K) position, followed by the alternate position. The LLD position afforded more rapid intubation, better glottic visualization, and less dental trauma. Eighty-seven percent of physicians completely visualized the glottis in the LLD position, versus 33% of the K position group. Intubation times were 10.5 versus 14.6 seconds in the LLD and K positions, respectively (P < .001). The LLD position is a more effective position (in a mannequin model) than the K position for intubation of patients found lying on the ground, a frequent situation in prehospital care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9337359 DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(97)90155-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Emerg Med ISSN: 0735-6757 Impact factor: 2.469