Literature DB >> 9335449

Does tumour uptake of Foscan determine PDT efficacy?

R Veenhuizen1, H Oppelaar, M Ruevekamp, J Schellens, O Dalesio, F Stewart.   

Abstract

Preferential retention of photosensitizers in tumours has always been one of the major goals in the search for new photosensitizers and has determined the design of clinical trials with respect to the interval between drug administration and illumination. The purpose of this study was to investigate the importance of tumour and plasma concentrations of Foscan (mTHPC, meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin) in relation to PDT effect. Both pharmacokinetic and tumour response studies were carried out in mice bearing s.c. RIF1 tumours. mTHPC was injected in 1 or 2 doses of 0.3 mg x kg-1. For distribution studies, 14C-labelled mTHPC was given 5 min to 48 hr before determination of plasma and tumour drug levels. Non-labelled sensitizer was used to determine the PDT efficacy for illumination at 5 min to 48 hr after drug administration. PDT efficacy was greatest for illumination at 1 to 3 hr, and for an interval of 48 hr there was no significant tumour-growth delay. In contrast, mTHPC tumour drug levels reached a maximum 6 hr after injection and remained high for 48 hr. A comparison of pharmacokinetics and response studies revealed no significant correlation between tumour mTHPC levels and tumour response. There was, however, a significant correlation between plasma drug levels and tumour response for time intervals of 1 to 48 hr. This association may imply that PDT protocols should use shorter drug-light intervals in combination with lower drug doses. This would increase safety and decrease the extent and duration of normal tissue photosensitization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9335449     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19971009)73:2<236::aid-ijc13>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  6 in total

1.  Compartmental targeting for mTHPC-based photodynamic treatment in vivo: Correlation of efficiency, pharmacokinetics, and regional distribution of apoptosis.

Authors:  Julie Garrier; Aude Bressenot; Susanna Gräfe; Sophie Marchal; Soumya Mitra; Thomas H Foster; François Guillemin; Lina Bezdetnaya
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of liposomal chemophototherapy with short drug-light intervals.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Kevin A Carter; Emilie A G Molins; Ninfa L Straubinger; Jumin Geng; Shuai Shao; William J Jusko; Robert M Straubinger; Jonathan F Lovell
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Foscan uptake and tissue distribution in relation to photodynamic efficacy.

Authors:  P Cramers; M Ruevekamp; H Oppelaar; O Dalesio; P Baas; F A Stewart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Chemophototherapy: An Emerging Treatment Option for Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Dandan Luo; Kevin A Carter; Dyego Miranda; Jonathan F Lovell
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 16.806

5.  Targeted PDT agent eradicates TrkC expressing tumors via photodynamic therapy (PDT).

Authors:  Chin Siang Kue; Anyanee Kamkaew; Hong Boon Lee; Lip Yong Chung; Lik Voon Kiew; Kevin Burgess
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Low Blue Dose Photodynamic Therapy with Porphyrin-Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Complexes: In Vitro Study on Human Melanoma Cells.

Authors:  Simona Nistorescu; Ana-Maria Udrea; Madalina Andreea Badea; Iulia Lungu; Mihai Boni; Tatiana Tozar; Florian Dumitrache; Valentin-Adrian Maraloiu; Roua Gabriela Popescu; Claudiu Fleaca; Ecaterina Andronescu; Anca Dinischiotu; Angela Staicu; Mihaela Balas
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.