Literature DB >> 9335146

A comparative study of duplications in bacteria and eukaryotes: the importance of telomeres.

E Coissac1, E Maillier, P Netter.   

Abstract

The genomes of three bacteria (Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Escherichia coli) and two eukaryotes (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans) were compared. The distribution of their putative open reading frames (ORFs) was studied, and several conclusions were drawn: (1) All of these genomes, even the smallest, exhibit a significant proportion (7%-30%) of duplicated ORFs. This proportion is a function of genome size and appears unrelated to the bacteria/eukaryote division. (2) Some of these ORFs constitute families of up 20 or more members. (3) The levels of sequence similarity within these families are highly variable and their distribution is different among bacteria and eukaryotes. (4) In yeast, there are topological relationships between members of the same family. The paired ORFs are frequently in the same orientation with regard to their respective telomeres and located at comparable distances from them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9335146     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  9 in total

1.  Origin and fate of repeats in bacteria.

Authors:  G Achaz; E P C Rocha; P Netter; E Coissac
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Two duplicated genes DDI2 and DDI3 in budding yeast encode a cyanamide hydratase and are induced by cyanamide.

Authors:  Jia Li; Michael Biss; Yu Fu; Xin Xu; Stanley A Moore; Wei Xiao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Precise sequence complementarity between yeast chromosome ends and two classes of just-subtelomeric sequences.

Authors:  R J Britten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast.

Authors:  C Seoighe; K H Wolfe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Approach of the functional evolution of duplicated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a new classification method based on protein-protein interaction data.

Authors:  Christine Brun; Alain Guénoche; Bernard Jacq
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

7.  Dynamics of gene duplication in the genomes of chlorophyll d-producing cyanobacteria: implications for the ecological niche.

Authors:  Scott R Miller; A Michelle Wood; Robert E Blankenship; Maria Kim; Steven Ferriera
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Gene Duplications Are At Least 50 Times Less Frequent than Gene Transfers in Prokaryotic Genomes.

Authors:  Fernando D K Tria; William F Martin
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  DNA-triplex Forming Purine Repeat Containing Genes in Acinetobacter baumannii and Their Association with Infection and Adaptation.

Authors:  Himanshu N Singh; Moganty R Rajeswari
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.