Literature DB >> 9334792

An educational intervention as decision support for menopausal women.

M L Rothert1, M Holmes-Rovner, D Rovner, J Kroll, L Breer, G Talarczyk, N Schmitt, G Padonu, C Wills.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and test a decision support intervention (DSI) to assist women to make and act on informed decisions that are consistent with their values in the area of menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Mode and intensity of intervention were tested in midlife women (N = 248), randomly assigned to one of three intervention formats: written information only, guided discussion, or personalized decision exercise. Data were collected over 12 months. Knowledge, decisional conflict, satisfaction with health care provider, and self-efficacy improved following intervention and were maintained for 12 months for all groups. Women's adherence to their own plans over 12 months was 59% (exercise), 76% (calcium intake), and 89% (HRT). Carefully written information is effective in promoting knowledge, adherence, and satisfaction among well-educated, interested women. It was concluded that women can understand complex information, including tradeoffs regarding treatment options. Women will adhere to their own plans, suggesting that consumer rather than provider plans may be the more appropriate gold standard for measuring adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9334792     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199710)20:5<377::aid-nur2>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  28 in total

1.  Association of Psychosocial Symptoms, Blood Pressure, and Menopausal Status in African-American Women.

Authors:  Carolyn H Still; Sadia Tahir; Hossein N Yarandi; Mona Hassan; Faye A Gary
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  A tailored intervention to aid decision-making about hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Lori A Bastian; Susan Halabi; Laura Fish; Isaac M Lipkus; Hayden B Bosworth; Barbara K Rimer; Ilene C Siegler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2006

4.  Effect of adding a values clarification exercise to a decision aid on heart disease prevention: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Jennifer M Griffith; Lindy Behrend; Ziya Gizlice; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Predictors of compliance with a home-based exercise program added to usual medical care in preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis: an 18-month prospective study.

Authors:  M A Mayoux-Benhamou; C Roux; A Perraud; J Fermanian; H Rahali-Kachlouf; M Revel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Development and Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Prenatal Testing for Women of Advanced Maternal Age.

Authors:  E R Drake; L Engler-Todd; A M O'Connor; L C Surh; A Hunter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Factors Associated with African-American Women's Decisions to Participate in Genetic Research.

Authors:  Carolyn H Still; Faye A Gary; Patricia E McDonald; Hossein N Yarandi
Journal:  J Natl Black Nurses Assoc       Date:  2014-07

8.  Clinical decision making and outcome in routine care for people with severe mental illness (CEDAR): study protocol.

Authors:  Bernd Puschner; Sabine Steffen; Mike Slade; Helena Kaliniecka; Mario Maj; Andrea Fiorillo; Povl Munk-Jørgensen; Jens Ivar Larsen; Anikó Egerházi; Zoltan Nemes; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Thomas Becker
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?

Authors:  Andrew D M Kennedy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Factors associated with the difference in score between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about hormone therapy: a multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Tremblay; Annette M O'Connor; Ian D Graham; Georges A Wells; Mary Jane Jacobsen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.