Literature DB >> 9334760

Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.

P R Kileny1, A Boerst, T Zwolan.   

Abstract

We investigated late and cognitive (mismatch negativity, P300) auditory potentials in 14 children with cochlear implants between the ages of 4 and 12 years. Length of cochlear implant use ranged from 7 to 84 months. Three types of stimulus contrasts were used: (1) a loudness contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst presented at 75 (standard) and 90 dB sound pressure level (deviant); (2) a frequency contrast consisting of a 1500 Hz tone burst (standard) and a 3000 Hz tone burst (deviant) presented at 80 dB sound pressure level; and (3) a speech contrast consisting of "heed" (standard) and "who'd" (deviant) delivered with a roving loudness paradigm involving a randomized variation of the levels of the standard and deviant stimuli. Latencies and amplitudes of components N1, P2, N2, and P3 and a mismatch negativity were measured. Overall, there were very few missing or unidentifiable components. P3 and mismatch negativity components were identified for all subjects and all stimuli. The latencies of most components were affected by stimulus type. There was a trend for longer latencies for the speech contrast compared with the loudness or frequency contrasts. This may be a reflection of the increased processing time required for the speech stimuli because of its higher complexity. There were several significant correlations between speech recognition and cognitive evoked potential latencies. These results indicate that the clinical use of cognitive evoked potentials in children with cochlear implants is feasible and informative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9334760     DOI: 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70169-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of cochlear implant users' performance using middle and late latency responses.

Authors:  Murat Kurnaz; Bulent Satar; Sertac Yetiser
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Auditory Evoked Potentials under Active and Passive Hearing Conditions in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chie Obuchi; Tsuneo Harashima; Masae Shiroma
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Interplay between singing and cortical processing of music: a longitudinal study in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ritva Torppa; Minna Huotilainen; Miika Leminen; Jari Lipsanen; Mari Tervaniemi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-10

4.  Cortical maturation in children with cochlear implants: Correlation between electrophysiological and behavioral measurement.

Authors:  Liliane Aparecida Fagundes Silva; Maria Inês Vieira Couto; Fernanda C L Magliaro; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Ana Claudia Martinho de Carvalho; Carla Gentile Matas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The P300 Auditory Event-Related Potential May Predict Segregation of Competing Speech by Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Duo-Duo Tao; Yun-Mei Zhang; Hui Liu; Wen Zhang; Min Xu; John J Galvin; Dan Zhang; Ji-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Characterization of Volume-Based Changes in Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials and Prepulse Inhibition.

Authors:  Thomas Potter; Sheng Li; Thinh Nguyen; Trac Nguyen; Nuri Ince; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Electrically Evoked Cortical Auditory Potentials in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Meghan Pike; Leigh Biagio-de Jager; Talita le Roux; Louis M Hofmeyr
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.