OBJECTIVE: To identify individual, parent/family, and treatment follow-through predictors of outcome for adolescent psychiatric inpatients 6 months after hospital discharge. METHOD: Eighty-nine adolescents participated in a comprehensive baseline evaluation during psychiatric hospitalization. Baseline measures included the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Social Adjustment Inventory for Children and Adolescents, Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS), and Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-Jr). Structured telephone follow-up interviews assessed treatment follow-through, suicidal behaviors, rehospitalizations, living changes, and social adaptive functioning. The RADS and SIQ-Jr were also readministered. RESULTS: Baseline indices of adolescent functioning emerged as the strongest predictors of outcomes. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that baseline depression severity, a cluster of parent/family indices, and medication follow-through were significant predictors of outcome depression severity. Baseline social adaptive functioning, presence/absence of conduct disorder, and medication follow-through were significant predictors of outcome social adaptive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The nature and course of adolescent psychopathology was difficult to disrupt, with baseline characteristics as the strongest predictors of outcome. Nevertheless, the significance of medication follow-through as a predictor suggests that treatment-related gains are possible.
OBJECTIVE: To identify individual, parent/family, and treatment follow-through predictors of outcome for adolescent psychiatric inpatients 6 months after hospital discharge. METHOD: Eighty-nine adolescents participated in a comprehensive baseline evaluation during psychiatric hospitalization. Baseline measures included the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Social Adjustment Inventory for Children and Adolescents, Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS), and Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire-Junior (SIQ-Jr). Structured telephone follow-up interviews assessed treatment follow-through, suicidal behaviors, rehospitalizations, living changes, and social adaptive functioning. The RADS and SIQ-Jr were also readministered. RESULTS: Baseline indices of adolescent functioning emerged as the strongest predictors of outcomes. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that baseline depression severity, a cluster of parent/family indices, and medication follow-through were significant predictors of outcome depression severity. Baseline social adaptive functioning, presence/absence of conduct disorder, and medication follow-through were significant predictors of outcome social adaptive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: The nature and course of adolescent psychopathology was difficult to disrupt, with baseline characteristics as the strongest predictors of outcome. Nevertheless, the significance of medication follow-through as a predictor suggests that treatment-related gains are possible.
Authors: Susan D Phillips; Teresa L Kramer; Scott N Compton; Barbara J Burns; James M Robbins Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Cheryl A King; Johnny Berona; Ewa Czyz; Adam G Horwitz; Polly Y Gipson Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Charles W Mueller; Ryan Tolman; Charmaine K Higa-McMillan; Eric L Daleiden Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 1.505