Literature DB >> 9333201

Perceptual learning in olfaction: professional wine tasters versus controls.

M Bende1, S Nordin.   

Abstract

By having professional wine tasters and controls perform olfactory tasks of absolute detection (1-butanol), discrimination (lemon and cloves), and identification (common household odors), the present two experiments studied (a) if perceptual odor learning takes place from odor experience acquired under nonlaboratory conditions, (b) if this learning generalizes to odors for which experience is limited, and (c) if generalized learning can be referred to increased general interest for odors that increases attention to odorous features. The results showed that whereas wine tasters were not better than controls on detection, they were superior to controls on discrimination and identification, the latter due to only a few odors. Ratings of experience with certain odors during professional evaluation suggest that generalized perceptual learning may take place in discrimination but not in identification. Wine tasters did not show more general interest for odorous features than did controls. The nonsuperiority in detection may be explained by the fact wine tasters have no professional experience of a detection task per se, implying that perceptual odor learning does not generalize from the olfactory tasks of discrimination and identification to detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9333201     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00251-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  13 in total

Review 1.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Roles of attention in perceptual learning from perspectives of psychophysics and animal learning.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsushima; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Recovery of olfactory function induces neuroplasticity effects in patients with smell loss.

Authors:  Kathrin Kollndorfer; Ksenia Kowalczyk; Elisabeth Hoche; Christian A Mueller; Michael Pollak; Siegfried Trattnig; Veronika Schöpf
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Not All Flavor Expertise Is Equal: The Language of Wine and Coffee Experts.

Authors:  Ilja Croijmans; Asifa Majid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Olfactory training induces changes in regional functional connectivity in patients with long-term smell loss.

Authors:  K Kollndorfer; F Ph S Fischmeister; K Kowalczyk; E Hoche; C A Mueller; S Trattnig; V Schöpf
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 7.  The impact of expertise in olfaction.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Royet; Jane Plailly; Anne-Lise Saive; Alexandra Veyrac; Chantal Delon-Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-13

8.  Hedonic appreciation and verbal description of pleasant and unpleasant odors in untrained, trainee cooks, flavorists, and perfumers.

Authors:  Caroline Sezille; Arnaud Fournel; Catherine Rouby; Fanny Rinck; Moustafa Bensafi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-24

9.  Experts and novices use the same factors--but differently--to evaluate pearl quality.

Authors:  Yusuke Tani; Takehiro Nagai; Kowa Koida; Michiteru Kitazaki; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quality-space theory in olfaction.

Authors:  Benjamin D Young; Andreas Keller; David Rosenthal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.