Literature DB >> 9332011

Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals.

P E Komers1, P N Brotherton.   

Abstract

Monogamy is typically considered to have evolved either because biparental care is important for offspring survival, or because males are unable to monopolize more than one female due to females being too dispersed. Here, in the first phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of monogamy in mammals, we show that neither of these explanations is consistent with the distribution of monogamy across mammal species. Monogamy evolved significantly more often in the absence of paternal care than in its presence. Furthermore, monogamy does not normally occur in species where female ranges are large. Rather, the most common feature of mammalian monogamy is that it evolved where females were solitary and occupied small, exclusive ranges, enabling males to monopolize them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9332011      PMCID: PMC1688588          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Molecular systematics of hystricognath rodents: evidence from the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene.

Authors:  M A Nedbal; M W Allard; R L Honeycutt
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.286

2.  Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii).

Authors:  P N Brotherton; J M Pemberton; P E Komers; G Malarky
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A composite estimate of primate phylogeny.

Authors:  A Purvis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Monogamy without biparental care in a dwarf antelope.

Authors:  P N Brotherton; A Rhodes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Monogamy in mammals.

Authors:  D G Kleiman
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.875

7.  The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates.

Authors:  B E Saether; I J Gordon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Mammalian mating systems.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-05-22

9.  Ochotona princeps (pika) myoglobin: an appraisal of lagomorph phylogeny.

Authors:  H Dene; M Goodman; M C McKenna; A E Romero-Herrera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  28 in total

1.  Back-casting sociality in extinct species: new perspectives using mass death assemblages and sex ratios.

Authors:  J Berger; S Dulamtseren; S Cain; D Enkkhbileg; P Lichtman; Z Namshir; G Wingard; R Reading
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female multiple mating behaviour, early reproductive failure and litter size variation in mammals.

Authors:  P Stockley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Paternity loss in contrasting mammalian societies.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; K Isvaran
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  The evolution of the social brain: anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates.

Authors:  Susanne Shultz; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Resource distribution influences mating system in the bobuck (Trichosurus cunninghami: Marsupialia).

Authors:  Jennifer K Martin; Angus A Martin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Behavioral correlates of extra-pair copulation in Indri indri.

Authors:  Giovanna Bonadonna; Valeria Torti; Rose Marie Randrianarison; Nicole Martinet; Marco Gamba; Cristina Giacoma
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Social monogamy in wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) of Argentina: the potential influences of resource distribution and ranging patterns.

Authors:  Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 8.  Home ranges, habitat and body mass: simple correlates of home range size in ungulates.

Authors:  Endre Grüner Ofstad; Ivar Herfindal; Erling Johan Solberg; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Life histories and the evolution of cooperative breeding in mammals.

Authors:  Dieter Lukas; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The Fitness Effects of Men's Family Investments : A Test of Three Pathways in a Single Population.

Authors:  Jeffrey Winking; Jeremy Koster
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.