Literature DB >> 9331480

The effects of frontal cortical lesions on remembering depend on the procedural demands of tasks performed in the radial arm maze.

M C Porter1, R G Mair.   

Abstract

We trained 24 rats to perform an eight-arm radial maze task and then assigned them with a matching procedure to one of three treatments: sham surgery or lesions of the projection areas of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MDn) in the medial wall (MW) or in both the MW and rhinal sulcal (RS) areas of frontal cortex. After recovery we trained the rats to perform six tasks, beginning with the standard eight-arm task, followed by two versions of a four forced choice procedure, and then three versions of a two-choice delayed-nonmatching-to-sample (DNMTS) task. The two lesion groups performed comparably on all tasks, showing that impairments were not exacerbated by extension of the MW lesion to include all cortical areas innervated by MDn. As in previous studies, frontal animals performed the radial maze task poorly immediately after surgery but improved with subsequent training. Controlling the order of the arm entries by opening the first four gates in a random sequence had little effect on performance, although frontal animals were impaired when lengthy delays (5 or 15 min) were imposed after the last of the four forced entries. Frontal animals were not impaired on two-choice DNMTS when the arms used for training were selected at random from the eight alternatives on a trial by trial basis, even when visual cues were eliminated by darkening the room and covering the maze. Frontal animals were significantly impaired when the selection of sample and choice arms was limited to the same two alternatives on every trial. This finding may explain the reported sensitivity of DNMTS to the effects of frontal lesions when training is carried out in operant chambers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9331480     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(96)02272-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

Review 1.  The reuniens and rhomboid nuclei: neuroanatomy, electrophysiological characteristics and behavioral implications.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Cassel; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Michaël Loureiro; Thibault Cholvin; John C Dalrymple-Alford; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Prefrontal cortex HCN1 channels enable intrinsic persistent neural firing and executive memory function.

Authors:  Sébastien J Thuault; Gaël Malleret; Christine M Constantinople; Russell Nicholls; Irene Chen; Judy Zhu; Andrey Panteleyev; Svetlana Vronskaya; Matthew F Nolan; Randy Bruno; Steven A Siegelbaum; Eric R Kandel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Major diencephalic inputs to the hippocampus: supramammillary nucleus and nucleus reuniens. Circuitry and function.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 4.  Limbic circuitry of the midline thalamus.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes; Stephanie B Linley; Walter B Hoover
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Anhydroecgonine Methyl Ester (AEME), a Product of Cocaine Pyrolysis, Impairs Spatial Working Memory and Induces Striatal Oxidative Stress in Rats.

Authors:  Elisa Fraga Gomes; Ingryd Fortes Souza Lipaus; Cleciane Waldetário Martins; Andrezza Menezes Araújo; Josidéia Barreto Mendonça; Fabrício Souza Pelição; Evandro Carlos Lebarch; Lívia Carla de Melo Rodrigues; Ester Miyuki Nakamura-Palacios
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.911

6.  Lesions of reuniens and rhomboid thalamic nuclei impair radial maze win-shift performance.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Hembrook; Robert G Mair
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Age-dependent effects of repeated amphetamine exposure on working memory in rats.

Authors:  Luke K Sherrill; Jessica J Stanis; Joshua M Gulley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The activity of thalamic nucleus reuniens is critical for memory retrieval, but not essential for the early phase of "off-line" consolidation.

Authors:  Hao Mei; Nikos K Logothetis; Oxana Eschenko
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Representation of actions and outcomes in medial prefrontal cortex during delayed conditional decision-making: Population analyses of single neuron activity.

Authors:  Miranda J Francoeur; Robert G Mair
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 10.  The anterior thalamic nuclei and nucleus reuniens: So similar but so different.

Authors:  Mathias L Mathiasen; Shane M O'Mara; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 8.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.