Literature DB >> 9331211

Tube-shunt surgery versus neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the management of neovascular glaucoma.

T E Eid1, L J Katz, G L Spaeth, J J Augsburger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative effectiveness of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) and tube-shunt surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) control in eyes with neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
DESIGN: Retrospective, case-by-case matched, comparative group study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four patients with NVG treated with noncontact Nd:YAG-CPC were matched with 24 patients who underwent tube-shunt surgery. Matching criteria included the underlying disorder causing angle neovascularization, the lens status, and patient's age.
INTERVENTIONS: Tube-shunt surgery or Nd:YAG-CPC. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postoperative IOP (IOP > or = 6 and < or = 25 mmHg), visual acuity, and presence of any postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Satisfactory IOP control (IOP < or = 25 mmHg and > or = 6 mmHg) was achieved in 9 eyes (37.5%) treated with Nd:YAG-CPC compared with 16 eyes (66.7%) receiving a tube-shunt procedure (P = 0.04) over a mean follow-up of 16.9 +/- 14.6 and 15.2 +/- 11.8 months, respectively. In the matched pairs in both groups that had nonequivalent outcomes, the proportions with persistently high IOP or hypotony were both greater in the CPC group than in the tube-shunt group. The cumulative proportion of failure in the CPC group was 20.8% at 6 months, 35.4% at 1 year, and 71.2% at 3 years postoperatively. In the tube-shunt group, the cumulative proportions of failure at 6 months and 1 year were close to those in the CPC group (12.5% and 29.2%, respectively), but lower 3 years after surgery (43.3%). Eleven eyes (45.8%) in the CPC group lost light perception versus four eyes (16.7%) in the tube-shunt group. Complication rate was higher in the tube-shunt group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in the management of NVG, tube-shunt surgery more frequently controls IOP in a satisfactory range, with less hypotony and less visual loss, than noncontact Nd:YAG-CPC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9331211     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30078-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  7 in total

Review 1.  Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.

Authors:  D S Minckler; S S Vedula; T J Li; M C Mathew; R S Ayyala; B A Francis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

2.  Surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zakhar Shchomak; David Cordeiro Sousa; Inês Leal; Luís Abegão Pinto
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The Ahmed glaucoma valve in neovascular glaucoma (An AOS Thesis).

Authors:  Peter A Netland
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

4.  [The Ahmed glaucoma valve. Medium term results].

Authors:  K Hille; M Rossi; A Hille; K W Ruprecht
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  The influence of etiology on surgical outcomes in neovascular glaucoma.

Authors:  Charles M Medert; Catherine Q Sun; Elizabeth Vanner; Richard K Parrish; Sarah R Wellik
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma.

Authors:  Wesam S Shalaby; Allen Y Ganjei; Brian Wogu; Jonathan S Myers; Marlene R Moster; Reza Razeghinejad; Daniel Lee; Natasha N Kolomeyer; Tarek E Eid; L Jay Katz; Aakriti G Shukla
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

7.  Surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma with Ex-PRESS glaucoma shunt: Case report.

Authors:  Teng-Chieh Yu; Gow-Lieng Tseng; Chun-Chen Chen; Shiow-Wen Liou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.