Literature DB >> 9330460

Influenza vaccination in 22 developed countries: an update to 1995.

D S Fedson1, Y Hirota, H K Shin, P E Cambillard, J Kiely, F Ambrosch, C Hannoun, J Leese, M J Sprenger, A W Hampson, K Bro-Jørgensen, A M Ahlbom, H Nøkleby, M Valle, O Olafsson, F Salmerón, J Cloetta, H Rebelo de Andrade, R Snacken, I Donatelli, L C Jennings, R A Strikas.   

Abstract

This study expands and updates through 1995 our earlier report on influenza vaccine use in 18 developed countries. Five of the six countries with high levels of vaccine use in 1992 (> or = 130 doses/1000 population) showed little change or slight declines over the subsequent 3 years. The exception was the United States, where a new federal program for vaccination reimbursement for the elderly helped to increase vaccine distribution from 144 to 239 doses/1000 population. The six countries with medium levels of vaccine use in 1992 (76-96 doses/1000 population) increased to > or = 100 doses/1000 population by 1995. Among the six low-use countries in 1992 (< or = 65 doses/1000 population), only Finland showed substantial improvement (96 doses/1000 population) in 1995. Four new countries were added to the study. In Germany, vaccine use increased to 80 doses/1000 population in 1995, but in Ireland it remained at a low level (48 doses/1000 population). In Korea, vaccine use increased from 17 to 95 doses/ 1000 population during the period 1987-1995. In Japan, very high levels of vaccine use (approximately 280 doses/1000 population) in the early 1980s were associated with vaccination programs for school children. However, vaccine use fell precipitously when these programs were discontinued, and only 2 and 8 doses/1000 population were used in 1994 and 1995, respectively. In all 22 countries, higher levels of vaccine use were associated with vaccination reimbursement programs under national or social health insurance and were not correlated with different levels of economic development. Excluding Japan, in 1995 there was still a greater than fourfold difference between the highest and lowest levels of vaccine use among the other 21 countries in the study. Given its well established clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, none of these countries has yet achieved the full benefits of its programs for influenza vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9330460     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00091-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  14 in total

1.  Influenza vaccination in 29 countries. An update to 1997.

Authors:  F Ambrosch; D S Fedson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Routine influenza vaccination for healthy children--old concept, new technologies.

Authors:  W E Beyer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Confounding by indication in non-experimental evaluation of vaccine effectiveness: the example of prevention of influenza complications.

Authors:  E Hak; Th J M Verheij; D E Grobbee; K L Nichol; A W Hoes
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Comparison of immunogenicity and safety of a virosome influenza vaccine with those of a subunit influenza vaccine in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  U B Schaad; U Bühlmann; R Burger; A Ruedeberg; A Wilder-Smith; M Rutishauser; F Sennhauser; C Herzog; M Zellmeyer; R Glück
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The health and economic benefits of influenza vaccination for healthy and at-risk persons aged 65 to 74 years.

Authors:  K L Nichol; M Goodman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Pneumococcal vaccination for older adults: the first 20 years.

Authors:  D S Fedson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Influenza vaccines in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Jördis J Ott; Janna Klein Breteler; John S Tam; Raymond C W Hutubessy; Mark Jit; Michiel R de Boer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Pharmacoeconomics of antiviral therapy for influenza in a Japanese hospital setting.

Authors:  Tadao Inoue; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Naohiko Chonabayashi; Yoshio Uetsuka
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Influenza vaccination in Austria, 1982-2003.

Authors:  Ursula Kunze; Ernest Groman; Gabriela Böhm; Michael Kunze
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

10.  Threat-responsiveness and the decision to obtain free influenza vaccinations among the older adults in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Chun Li; Chi-Mei Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.