Literature DB >> 9329552

Monitoring of therapy in inoperable lung cancer patients by measurement of CYFRA 21-1, TPA- TP CEA, and NSE.

W Ebert1, M Hoppe, T Muley, P Drings.   

Abstract

In a series of 381 consecutive patients with lung tumors and benign pulmonary diseases, we examined whether tumor markers CYFRA 21-1 (EIA, Boehringer, Mannheim), TPA-M (IRMA AB Sangtec Medical, Bromma, Sweden), TPS (IRMA, Beki Diagnostics AB, Bromma, Sweden), CEA and NSE (EIA, Roche, Basel) have the potential to contribute to clinical decision-making processes with respect to diagnosis and assessment of response to therapy. The sensitivity values of the marker tests in NSCLC (CYFRA 21-1: 44.4% > 3.9 ng/ml, TPA-M: 39.4% > 200 U/ml, TPS: 13.2% > 230 U/ml, CEA: 37.5% > 8.6 ng/ml), in SCLC (NSE: 61.9% > 14.0 ng/ml) and in pleural mesothelioma (CYFRA 21-1 and TPS: 36.4%) were found to be clearly inferior to the yield of standard cytopathological examinations (85-98%) when using the 95% specificity versus the group with benign pulmonary disease as cut-off values. Therefore, currently available tumor markers are of minor value in the primary diagnosis of lung tumors. After curative surgery (Ro) of NSCLC only CYFRA 21-1 levels dropped to the normal range within one week. The other markers simulated residual tumor mass by displaying elevated marker levels after surgery. During the monitoring of response to chemo-/radiotherapy the changes in marker levels were compared to the clinical assessment according to standard criteria of the WHO. The criteria defined for marker response were a 65% decrease for a partial response and a 40% increase of the marker levels for progressive disease. Concordant results were obtained in 59.4% of the cases for CYFRA 21-1 (TPA-M: 63.3%, TPS: 65.5%, CEA: 54.8%, NSE: 68.9%). Most discordant results were obtained in tumor remission due to an insufficient decrease in the markers. Progressive disease was most effectively indicated by CYFRA 21-1 in NSCLC 60%) and by NSE in SCLC (70.0%). It is concluded that increasing marker levels may contribute to clinical decision making, at least in helping to decide which patients should no longer treated by ineffective and toxic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9329552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  6 in total

Review 1.  History, molecular features, and clinical importance of conventional serum biomarkers in lung cancer.

Authors:  Haruhiko Nakamura; Toshihide Nishimura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Elevated serum levels of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 predict poor prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib.

Authors:  Fengsheng Chen; Xi Luo; Jinbiao Zhang; Yang Lu; Rongcheng Luo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Discovery of lung cancer biomarkers by profiling the plasma proteome with monoclonal antibody libraries.

Authors:  Mariana Guergova-Kuras; István Kurucz; William Hempel; Nadège Tardieu; János Kádas; Carole Malderez-Bloes; Anne Jullien; Yann Kieffer; Marina Hincapie; András Guttman; Eszter Csánky; Balázs Dezso; Barry L Karger; László Takács
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Systematic review of CYFRA 21-1 as a prognostic indicator and its predictive correlation with clinicopathological features in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zipu Yu; Guofei Zhang; Maoying Yang; Sai Zhang; Baiqin Zhao; Gang Shen; Ying Chai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

5.  Glycodelin as a Serum and Tissue Biomarker for Metastatic and Advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Marc A Schneider; Thomas Muley; Rebecca Weber; Sabine Wessels; Michael Thomas; Felix J F Herth; Nicolas C Kahn; Ralf Eberhardt; Hauke Winter; Gudula Heussel; Arne Warth; Christel Herold-Mende; Michael Meister
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients.

Authors:  J-L Pujol; O Molinier; W Ebert; J-P Daurès; F Barlesi; G Buccheri; M Paesmans; E Quoix; D Moro-Sibilot; M Szturmowicz; J-M Bréchot; T Muley; J Grenier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.