Literature DB >> 9329419

Minitympanometry in detecting middle ear fluid.

P Koivunen1, O P Alho, M Uhari, M Niemelä, J Luotonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time needed to perform tympanometry, the success rate and the importance of the child's cooperation for the accuracy of minitympanometry in detecting middle ear fluid, and the relation between the static admittance of the tympanogram and the weight of the middle ear fluid. STUDY
DESIGN: Two series of patients were enrolled. The first consisted of 206 consecutive children (mean age 4.7 years, range 1 month to 16 years) from the Outpatient Emergency Department of Pediatrics in the University of Oulu; the second group consisted of 162 children (age range 7 months to 8 years) who were referred to the Department of Otolaryngology for adenoidectomy, tympanostomy, or both procedures. In the first series the success rate and the time needed to complete a minitympanometric examination on each ear were recorded. In the second series, the tympanograms were evaluated according to the cooperation of the children at the time of the tympanometric examination, and the weight of the middle ear fluid was measured and compared with the static admittance of the minitympanometric curve. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated separately for cooperative and uncooperative patients.
RESULTS: In the first series, the mean time needed for tympanometry was 2.1 minutes (range 0.5 to 10 minutes), and 179 (86.9%) of the patients were cooperative. In the second series, the sensitivity and specificity calculated for tympanometry in detecting middle ear fluid were 79% and 93% among the cooperative children. In the uncooperative group, sensitivity and specificity were 71% and 38%, respectively. The weight of the middle ear fluid varied from 5 mg to 695 mg. There was a significant negative correlation (r = -0.66, p < 0.001) between the static admittance in minitympanometry and the weight of the middle ear fluid.
CONCLUSION: Minitympanometry can be done quickly, it fails rarely, and in cooperative patients it is a better tool than has been earlier suggested, but it is useless in uncooperative children. The amount of middle ear fluid varies notably even among young children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9329419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical considerations in the diagnosis of otitis media.

Authors:  Monte R Klaudt; William J Steinbach; Theodore C Sectish
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Does early detection of otitis media with effusion prevent delayed language development?

Authors:  C C Butler; H MacMillan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Spectral gradient acoustic reflectometry in the diagnosis of middle-ear fluid in children.

Authors:  Henriikka Lindén; Heikki Teppo; Matti Revonta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Can nurses exclude middle-ear effusion without otoscopy in young asymptomatic children in primary care?

Authors:  Miia K Laine; Paula A Tähtinen; Olli Ruuskanen; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Aino Ruohola
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Can trained nurses exclude acute otitis media with tympanometry or acoustic reflectometry in symptomatic children?

Authors:  Miia K Laine; Paula A Tähtinen; Olli Ruuskanen; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Aino Ruohola
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 6.  New Approaches and Technologies to Improve Accuracy of Acute Otitis Media Diagnosis.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Sonia Bianchini; Alberto Argentiero; Riccardo Gobbi; Claudio Vicini; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.