Literature DB >> 9329305

Water fluoridation, tooth decay in 5 year olds, and social deprivation measured by the Jarman score: analysis of data from British dental surveys.

C M Jones1, G O Taylor, J G Whittle, D Evans, D P Trotter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of water fluoridation, both artificial and natural, on dental decay, after socioeconomic deprivation was controlled for.
DESIGN: Ecological study based on results from the NHS dental surveys in 5 year olds in 1991-2 and 1993-4 and Jarman underprivileged area scores from the 1991 census.
SETTING: Electoral wards in three areas: Hartlepool (naturally fluoridated), Newcastle and North Tyneside (fluoridated), and Salford and Trafford (non-fluoridated).
SUBJECTS: 5 year old children (n = 10,004). INTERVENTION: Water fluoridation (artificial and occurring naturally). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ward tooth decay score (score on the "decayed, missing, and filled tooth index" for each electoral ward).
RESULTS: Multiple linear regression showed a significant interaction between Jarman score for ward, mean number of teeth affected by decay, and both types of water fluoridation. This confirms that the more deprived an area, the greater benefit derived from fluoridation, whether natural or artificial (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001). At a Jarman score of zero (national mean score) there was a predicted 44% reduction in decay in fluoridated areas, increasing to a 54% reduction in wards with a Jarman score of 40 (very deprived). The area with natural fluoridation (at a level of 1.2 parts per million-higher than levels in artificially fluoridated areas) had a 66% reduction in decay, with a 74% reduction in wards with a Jarman score of 40.
CONCLUSION: Tooth decay is confirmed as a disease associated with social deprivation, and the more socially deprived areas benefit more from fluoridation. Widespread water fluoridation is urgently needed to reduce the "dental health divide" by improving the dental health of the poorer people in Britain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9329305      PMCID: PMC2127367          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  8 in total

1.  Fluoridation of water supplies. Debate on the ethics must be informed by sound science.

Authors:  D Coggon; C Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

2.  Water fluoridation is safe and effective.

Authors:  J F Beal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

3.  Survival after acute lymphocytic leukaemia: effects of socioeconomic status and geographic region.

Authors:  J A Schillinger; P C Grosclaude; S Honjo; M J Quinn; A Sloggett; M P Coleman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Fluoride Concentration of Water Supply in Eastern Saudi Arabia: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eman Abduljalil Bakhurji; Yazeed Saeed Alqahtani
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-16

5.  Credibility of subgroup analyses by socioeconomic status in public health intervention evaluations: An underappreciated problem?

Authors:  Greig Inglis; Daryll Archibald; Lawrence Doi; Yvonne Laird; Stephen Malden; Louise Marryat; John McAteer; Jan Pringle; John Frank
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-10-19

6.  The relationships between two different drinking water fluoride levels, dental fluorosis and bone mineral density of children.

Authors:  S R Grobler; A J Louw; U M E Chikte; R J Rossouw; T J van W Kotze
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-04-03

7.  Inequalities in public water supply fluoridation in Brazil: An ecological study.

Authors:  Marilisa C L Gabardo; Wander J da Silva; Marcia Olandoski; Simone T Moysés; Samuel J Moysés
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  The economic value of Quebec's water fluoridation program.

Authors:  Eric Tchouaket; Astrid Brousselle; Alvine Fansi; Pierre Alexandre Dionne; Elise Bertrand; Christian Fortin
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2013-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.