C M Vargas1, V L Burt, R F Gillum, E R Pamuk. 1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is the main data source for hypertension surveillance. However, because of a gap of almost 10 years between each NHANES, self-reported data from annual surveys need to be examined as an alternative data source. This study analyzes the validity of self-reported hypertension in a national sample of non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican-Americans. METHODS: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive (PVP) and negative (PVN) of self-reported hypertension were calculated against two definitions of hypertension: the definition recommended by the Third Joint National Committee on Hypertension, JNC III (blood pressure > or = 140/90 and/or taking antihypertension medication) and a broader definition including control with lifestyle modifications. Data used come from the NHANES III, 1988-1991. RESULTS: Overall test characteristics using the JNC III definition are sensitivity 71%, specificity 90%, PVP 72%, and PVN 89%. Test characteristics were consistently higher for the broad than for the JNC III definition. Validity of self-reported hypertension is higher among women than among men and among persons with a medical visit during the past year than among those with no visits: validity was lowest among Mexican-American men. Due to the similarity between sensitivity and PVP, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension is nearly equal to the prevalence of JNC III-defined hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported hypertension may be used for surveillance of hypertension trends, in the absence of measured blood pressure, among non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic black women and persons with a medical visit in the past year. Validation should be repeated with each NHANES.
BACKGROUND: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is the main data source for hypertension surveillance. However, because of a gap of almost 10 years between each NHANES, self-reported data from annual surveys need to be examined as an alternative data source. This study analyzes the validity of self-reported hypertension in a national sample of non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican-Americans. METHODS: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive (PVP) and negative (PVN) of self-reported hypertension were calculated against two definitions of hypertension: the definition recommended by the Third Joint National Committee on Hypertension, JNC III (blood pressure > or = 140/90 and/or taking antihypertension medication) and a broader definition including control with lifestyle modifications. Data used come from the NHANES III, 1988-1991. RESULTS: Overall test characteristics using the JNC III definition are sensitivity 71%, specificity 90%, PVP 72%, and PVN 89%. Test characteristics were consistently higher for the broad than for the JNC III definition. Validity of self-reported hypertension is higher among women than among men and among persons with a medical visit during the past year than among those with no visits: validity was lowest among Mexican-American men. Due to the similarity between sensitivity and PVP, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension is nearly equal to the prevalence of JNC III-defined hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported hypertension may be used for surveillance of hypertension trends, in the absence of measured blood pressure, among non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic black women and persons with a medical visit in the past year. Validation should be repeated with each NHANES.
Authors: Eun Ji Kim; Taekyu Kim; Joseph Conigliaro; Jane M Liebschutz; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Amresh D Hanchate Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laura J Julian; Chris Tonner; Ed Yelin; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Lindsey A Criswell; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Nancy Krieger; Dana Carney; Katie Lancaster; Pamela D Waterman; Anna Kosheleva; Mahzarin Banaji Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michelle K McHugh; Matthew B Schabath; Chung-Han Ho; Mei Liu; Anthony M D'Amelio; Anthony J Greisinger; George L Delclos; Margaret R Spitz; Carol J Etzel Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2013-10
Authors: Theo Bodin; Maria Albin; Jonas Ardö; Emilie Stroh; Per-Olof Ostergren; Jonas Björk Journal: Environ Health Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 5.984