Literature DB >> 9327150

The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.

S Weber1, F K Storm, J Stitt, D M Mahvi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of frozen section analysis during breast conservation surgery is undefined. Assessment of margins using permanent section evaluation is the standard method of ensuring complete tumor excision. If the margin is positive, however, surgical re-excision is necessary to reduce the likelihood of subsequent local recurrence. Therefore, biopsy of the surgical cavity with immediate pathological evaluation during lumpectomy was performed to evaluate the effect on local recurrence, the number of re-excisions, and cosmesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty patients underwent attempted lumpectomy with frozen section margin determination. One hundred forty patients were available for long-term follow-up (mean = 57 months, median = 46 months). All patients underwent attempted breast conservation surgery, which consisted of tumorectomy with excision of a greater than 1-cm rim of grossly normal tissue. Tumor margins were obtained by intraoperative biopsy with frozen section analysis of the lumpectomy cavity walls.
RESULTS: In 21 patients (15%), frozen section analyses (FSA) revealed positive margins, resulting in immediate re-excision. In seven of these patients (5%), margins were persistently positive, and these patients therefore underwent mastectomy. Fourteen patients were successfully re-excised to a negative margin. The sensitivity and specificity of FSA were 91% and 100%, respectively. Five percent of patients definitively managed by lumpectomy with FSA of margins recurred locally. The mean cosmesis score after radiotherapy was 7.0 out of a possible 10, correlating with a good to excellent result. DISCUSSION: The accuracy of FSA, low recurrence rate, avoidance of reoperation, and good cosmesis indicate that intraoperative frozen section analysis should be adopted as a safe and effective method of margin analysis during breast conservation surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9327150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am        ISSN: 1081-4442


  18 in total

1.  [Minutes of the working group on gynecopathology and breast pathology. On the occasion of the 92nd Annual Congress of the German Society for Pathology in Berlin].

Authors:  S Lax; A Lebeau; A Schneider
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy.

Authors:  Yuankai K Tao; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; Osman O Ahsen; Helen H Wang; Daniel B Schmolze; Nicole B Johnson; Jeffrey S Brooker; Alex E Cable; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effect of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology Followed by Frozen Section on Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Tamaki Tamanuki; Maki Namura; Tomoyoshi Aoyagi; Sinichirou Shimizu; Tomoko Suwa; Hiroshi Matsuzaki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Positive margin rates following breast-conserving surgery for stage I-III breast cancer: palpable versus nonpalpable tumors.

Authors:  Jordan Atkins; Fatema Al Mushawah; Catherine M Appleton; Amy E Cyr; William E Gillanders; Rebecca L Aft; Timothy J Eberlein; Feng Gao; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 6.  Intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen section pathology for margin assessment in breast conservation surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla Esbona; Zhanhai Li; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  [Intraoperative pathological rapid investigations in breast surgery].

Authors:  M Dämmrich; C Thomssen; P Hillemanns; H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.

Authors:  Walter P Weber; Stephan Engelberger; Carsten T Viehl; Rosanna Zanetti-Dallenbach; Salome Kuster; Stephan Dirnhofer; Daniela Wruk; Daniel Oertli; Walter R Marti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Single acquisition label-free histology-like imaging with dual-contrast photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy.

Authors:  Benjamin Ecclestone; Deepak Dinakaran; Parsin Haji Reza
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.