Literature DB >> 9327053

Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets?

S P McKee1, S N Watamaniuk, J M Harris, H S Smallman, D G Taylor.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that breaking camouflage is one of the major functions of stereopsis (Julesz, 1971). In this study, we found that stereopsis is less effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets than for static ones. Observers were asked to detect a single dot moving on a straight trajectory amidst identical noise dots in random motion. In the three-dimensional (3D) condition, the noise dots filled a cylindrical volume 5.7 cm in height and diameter; the trajectory signal dot moved on an oblique 3D trajectory through the center of the cylinder. In the two-dimensional (2D) control condition, observers viewed one half-image of the 3D cylinder binocularly. Surprisingly, trajectory detection in the 3D condition was only slightly better than in the 2D condition. Stereoscopic tuning for motion detection was also measured with a novel target configuration in which the random motion noise was presented in two depth planes that straddled the fixation plane where the trajectory target was presented. As the disparity between the noise planes and the fixation plane was increased, trajectory detection improved, reaching a peak between 6 and 12 arcmin, and then declining to the 2D level at larger disparities, where the noise became diplopic. Similar tuning measurements were made for detecting a static pattern, a string of five aligned dots presented in the fixation plane between two planes of static noise dots. Adding disparity to the noise planes produced a far greater improvement in static detection than in motion detection, for a comparable range of disparities (1.5-12 arcmin). We speculate that the temporal characteristics of the stereo system are not well suited for responding to moving targets, with the result that stereo does not greatly enhance motion detection in noise.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9327053     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00330-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Computer vision, camouflage breaking and countershading.

Authors:  Ariel Tankus; Yehezkel Yeshurun
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Disparity-tuned population responses from human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Justin M Ales; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Bees use three-dimensional information to improve target detection.

Authors:  Alexander Kapustjansky; Lars Chittka; Johannes Spaethe
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-12-04

4.  Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors:  Roshani Gnanaseelan; Dave A Gonzalez; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?

Authors:  James A M Galloway; Samuel D Green; Martin Stevens; Laura A Kelley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  On Visually-Grounded Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Perceptual Grouping and 2D/3D Presentation Mode.

Authors:  Ruud Koolen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-01

7.  The role of binocular disparity in rapid scene and pattern recognition.

Authors:  Matteo Valsecchi; Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-04-16

8.  Unifying time to contact estimation and collision avoidance across species.

Authors:  Matthias S Keil; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

Authors:  Stephen H Adamo; Justin M Ericson; Joseph C Nah; Rachel Brem; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  Binocular disparity can augment the capacity of vision without affecting subjective experience of depth.

Authors:  Henry Railo; Joni Saastamoinen; Sipi Kylmälä; Aapo Peltola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.