Literature DB >> 9326795

Measurement of 2,4-toluenediamine in urine and serum samples from women with Même or Replicon breast implants.

T R Hester1, N F Ford, P J Gale, J L Hammett, R Raymond, D Turnbull, V H Frankos, M B Cohen.   

Abstract

The objective of this matched case-control study was to determine whether women with Même or Replicon polyurethane-covered silicone breast implants are exposed to clinically significant levels of free 2,4-TDA from biodegradation of the polyurethane foam. Urine and serum samples were obtained from 61 patients with Même or Replicon breast implants and 61 controls on two separate occasions separated by 10 +/- 3 days. Free TDA was analyzed by gas chromatography combined with negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry with lower limit of quantitation in both urine and serum of 10 pg/ml. The results were correlated with the length of time since implantation. No patients or controls had detectable free 2,4-TDA in their sera. Thirty patients had quantifiable levels of free 2,4-TDA, and 18 had detectable levels in their urine. Controls had no quantifiable levels, but 7 subjects had detectable levels. The biodegradative half-life of the polyurethane foam was estimated to be 2 years. A risk assessment using the cancer potency estimate calculated by the FDA from rat data and the National Academy of Sciences methodology provided a theoretical lifetime risk of approximately one in one million. It was concluded that the polyurethane foam cover on the Même and Replicon breast implants biodegrades. The risk assessment of approximately one in one million derived from this study strengthens earlier conclusions by the Health Protection Branch (Canada) that there is no significant risk of cancer from exposure to the 2,4-TDA formed from this biodegradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9326795     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199710000-00035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nikki Castel; Taylor Soon-Sutton; Peter Deptula; Anna Flaherty; Fereydoun Don Parsa
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-03-16

3.  Lifetime risk from polyurethane covered breast implants.

Authors:  K Kulig
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Breast Implant Surfaces and Their Impact on Current Practices: Where We Are Now and Where Are We Going?

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Mark W Clemens; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 5.  History of breast implants: Back to the future.

Authors:  Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo; Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Michail Sorotos
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-03-11

Review 6.  New exposure biomarkers as tools for breast cancer epidemiology, biomonitoring, and prevention: a systematic approach based on animal evidence.

Authors:  Ruthann A Rudel; Janet M Ackerman; Kathleen R Attfield; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Future challenges in the in vitro and in vivo evaluation of biomaterial biocompatibility.

Authors:  James M Anderson
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2016-03-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.