Literature DB >> 9326413

In situ splitting of the cadaveric liver for transplantation.

J A Goss1, H Yersiz, C R Shackleton, P Seu, C V Smith, J S Markowitz, D G Farmer, R M Ghobrial, J F Markmann, W S Arnaout, D K Imagawa, S D Colquhoun, M H Fraiman, S V McDiarmid, R W Busuttil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric donor livers is the rate-limiting step in clinical liver transplantation. Split liver transplantation provides a means to expand the cadaveric donor pool. However, this concept has not reached its full potential because of inferior patient and graft survival and high complication rates when traditional ex vivo split techniques are used. Therefore we sought to evaluate the safety, applicability, and effectiveness of a new technique for split liver transplantation.
METHODS: This study consists of 15 in situ split liver procurements, which resulted in 28 liver transplants. In situ splitting of selected livers from hemodynamically stable cadaveric donors was performed at the donor hospital without any additional work-up or equipment being needed. In situ liver splitting is accomplished in a manner identical to the living-donor procurement. This technique for liver splitting results in a left lateral segment graft (segments 2 and 3) and a right trisegmental graft (segments 1 and 4-8). This procedure required the use of the donor hospital operating room for an additional 1.5-2.5 hr and did not interfere with the procurement of 30 kidneys, 12 hearts, 7 lungs, and 9 pancreata from these same donors.
RESULTS: The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rates were 92% and 92%, respectively, while the 6-month and 1-year actuarial graft survival rates were 86% and 86%, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year actuarial patient survival rate of patients who received a left lateral segment graft was 100% and 100%, respectively, while those who received a right trisegmental graft had 6-month and 1-year rates of 86% and 86%, respectively. The actuarial death-censored graft survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 80% and 80%, respectively, for the left lateral segment grafts, and 93% and 93%, respectively, for the right trisegmental grafts. Alograft and patient survival was independent of United Network for Organ Sharing status at the time of liver transplantation. No patient developed a biliary stricture, required re-exploration for intra-abdominal hemorrhage, or suffered from portal vein, hepatic vein, or hepatic artery thrombosis
CONCLUSIONS: In situ split liver transplantation can be accomplished without complications and provides results that are superior to those obtained previously with ex vivo methods. It abolishes ex vivo benching and prolonged ischemia times and provides two optimal grafts with hemostasis accomplished. This technique decreases pediatric waiting time and allows adult recipients to receive right-sided grafts safely. In situ splitting is the method of choice for expanding the cadaveric liver donor pool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9326413     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199709270-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Debora Kogan-Liberman; Sukru Emre; Benjamin L Shneider
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-02

2.  Split-liver transplantation in the United States: outcomes of a national survey.

Authors:  John F Renz; Jean C Emond; Hasan Yersiz; Nancy L Ascher; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cantlie's plane in major variations of the primary portal vein ramification at the porta hepatis: cutting experiment using cadaveric livers.

Authors:  Saiho Ko; Gen Murakami; Tetsuhiro Kanamura; Toshio J Sato; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Current status and perspectives in split liver transplantation.

Authors:  Andrea Lauterio; Stefano Di Sandro; Giacomo Concone; Riccardo De Carlis; Alessandro Giacomoni; Luciano De Carlis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Outcomes in adult recipients of right-sided liver grafts in split-liver procedures.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Alexis Laurent; Claude Tayar; Jean-Claude Merle; Jean-Yves Lauzet; Monica Hurtova; Thomas Decaens; Christophe Duvoux; Daniel Cherqui
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Split-liver transplantation for two adult recipients: feasibility and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  D Azoulay; D Castaing; R Adam; E Savier; V Delvart; V Karam; B Y Ming; M Dannaoui; J Krissat; H Bismuth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Feasibility and limits of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors: an italian multicenter experience.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Marco Spada; Michele Colledan; Giuliano Torre; Enzo Andorno; Umberto Valente; Giorgio Rossi; Paolo Reggiani; Umberto Cillo; Umberto Baccarani; Gian Luca Grazi; Giuseppe Tisone; Franco Filipponi; Massimo Rossi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mauro Salizzoni; Oreste Cuomo; Tullia De Feo; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of split liver transplantation in children.

Authors:  Rahul R Deshpande; Matthew J Bowles; Hector Vilca-Melendez; Parthi Srinivasan; Raffaele Girlanda; Anil Dhawan; Giorgina Mieli-Vergani; Paolo Muiesan; Nigel D Heaton; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Russell Strong and the history of reduced-size liver transplantation.

Authors:  Guiseppe Garcea; Hajir Nabi; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.