OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the following points about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): 1) characterization of a wide population; 2) sensitivity of electrodiagnostic tests, and particularly the contribution of disto-proximal ratio test; 3) validity of a neurophysiological classification developed by us. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study in 500 hands with CTS symptoms. Neurophysiological "standard" tests were always performed: sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) first- and third digit-wrist and distal motor latency (DML). In "standard negative" hands disto-proximal ratio technique (R) was performed. Neurophysiological classification: Extreme CTS (absence of median motor, sensory responses), Severe (absence of sensory response, abnormal DML), Moderate (abnormal SNCV, abnormal DML), Mild (abnormal SNCV, normal DML), Minimal (abnormal R or other segmental/comparative test, normal standard tests). RESULTS: Sensibility of standard tests: 77%. R increased the diagnostic yield by 20%. CTS classification appeared reliable with significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: R is a useful test, the classification may be useful in clinical/therapeutical decisions.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the following points about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): 1) characterization of a wide population; 2) sensitivity of electrodiagnostic tests, and particularly the contribution of disto-proximal ratio test; 3) validity of a neurophysiological classification developed by us. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study in 500 hands with CTS symptoms. Neurophysiological "standard" tests were always performed: sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) first- and third digit-wrist and distal motor latency (DML). In "standard negative" hands disto-proximal ratio technique (R) was performed. Neurophysiological classification: Extreme CTS (absence of median motor, sensory responses), Severe (absence of sensory response, abnormal DML), Moderate (abnormal SNCV, abnormal DML), Mild (abnormal SNCV, normal DML), Minimal (abnormal R or other segmental/comparative test, normal standard tests). RESULTS: Sensibility of standard tests: 77%. R increased the diagnostic yield by 20%. CTS classification appeared reliable with significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: R is a useful test, the classification may be useful in clinical/therapeutical decisions.
Authors: A S Klauser; M Abd Ellah; C Kremser; M Taljanovic; G Schmidle; M Gabl; F Cartes-Zumelzu; R Steiger; E R Gizewski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anika Filius; Andrew R Thoreson; Yuexiang Wang; Sandra M Passe; Chunfeng Zhao; Kai-Nan An; Peter C Amadio Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Jessica E Goetz; Nicole M Kunze; Erin K Main; Daniel R Thedens; Thomas E Baer; Ericka A Lawler; Thomas D Brown Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 3.934