Literature DB >> 9323780

Fifteen years with clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension--still discrepancies between intentions and practice.

I Hetlevik1, J Holmen, O Krüger, A Holen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess physicians' current adherence to the Norwegian clinical guidelines for the treatment of hypertension.
DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective registration of information from patient records of one specified year. In addition, mailed questionnaire to examine the representativeness of the participating doctors.
SETTING: General practice in Sør- and Nord-Trøndelag counties in Norway, 380,000 inhabitants. PATIENTS: In one year 2468 patients were registered with the diagnosis of hypertension in the records of 56 general practitioners. The patients were 57% women and 43% men; 41% were 70 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels of blood pressure in accordance with the recommendations of the Norwegian clinical guidelines for hypertension. Fractions of patients with a measured blood pressure and serum cholesterol in one year.
RESULTS: At least one blood pressure was recorded in 95% of the hypertensive patients during the specified year. The systolic blood pressure was 140 mmHg or less in 25% and 160 mmHg or less in 65%, while the diastolic blood pressure was 90 mmHg or less in 61%. According to the Norwegian clinical guidelines for systolic blood pressure, 29% of the women and 21% of the men were above recommended levels for treatment. With respect to the diastolic blood pressure, the figures were 38% for women and 40% for men. Patients under 60 years of age were often not treated according to the recommendations. Serum cholesterol was not recorded during the specified year in 68% of the total group, nor in 55% of patients aged 65 years or younger.
CONCLUSION: There are still major discrepancies between current practice and the intentions laid down in the Norwegian clinical guidelines. A discussion of alternative methods for implementation and for evaluation of the efficacy of clinical guidelines is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9323780     DOI: 10.3109/02813439709018503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  4 in total

1.  GPs' thoughts on prescribing medication and evidence-based knowledge: the benefit aspect is a strong motivator. A descriptive focus group study.

Authors:  Ingmarie Skoglund; Kerstin Segesten; Cecilia Björkelund
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Use and usefulness of guidelines for sickness certification: results from a national survey of all general practitioners in Sweden.

Authors:  Ylva Skånér; Gunnar H Nilsson; Britt Arrelöv; Christina Lindholm; Elin Hinas; Anna Löfgren Wilteus; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  The role of Decision Support System (DSS) in prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghupathy Anchala; Maria P Pinto; Amir Shroufi; Rajiv Chowdhury; Jean Sanderson; Laura Johnson; Patricia Blanco; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Is there an association between disease ignorance and self-rated health? The HUNT Study, a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Pål Jørgensen; Arnulf Langhammer; Steinar Krokstad; Siri Forsmo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.