Literature DB >> 9323663

Jaffee v. Redmond: making the courts a tool of injustice?

K W Chan1.   

Abstract

In July, 1996, the United States Supreme Court held in Jaffee v. Redmond that statements made to a psychotherapist are privileged communications in a federal action. Prior to Jaffee, the federal courts were not in agreement as to whether this privilege existed. The majority found strong public and private interests that were furthered by recognition of the privilege. The minority, however, reasoned that the "occasional injustices" due to the exclusion of evidence made the courts a tool of injustice. Although the privilege is now recognized in federal courts, its contours and exceptions remain to be decided on a case by case basis.

Keywords:  Jaffee v. Redmond; Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9323663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  2 in total

1.  Openness of patients' reporting with use of electronic records: psychiatric clinicians' views.

Authors:  Ronald M Salomon; Jennifer Urbano Blackford; S Trent Rosenbloom; Sandra Seidel; Ellen Wright Clayton; David M Dilts; Stuart G Finder
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Psychiatric electronic health records privacy in Jordan: A policy brief.

Authors:  Ahmed R Karajeh; Majd T Mrayyan
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.