Literature DB >> 9323060

Long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention.

N R Every1, L S Parsons, S D Fihn, E B Larson, C Maynard, A P Hallstrom, J S Martin, W D Weaver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented the strong association between availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and increased use of coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Although these studies have shown little influence of the availability of catheterization labs on hospital mortality, no long-term follow-up has been reported. METHODS AND
RESULTS: From a cohort of 12,331 AMI patients admitted to 19 Seattle area hospitals, we compared long-term outcome in 7985 patients admitted to hospitals with and 4346 patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization labs. During the index hospitalization, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (67.1% versus 39.3%, P<.0001), coronary angioplasty (32.5% versus 13.2%, P<.0001), or coronary bypass surgery (12.5% versus 9.5%, P<.0001). At 3-year follow-up, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site catheterization labs were more likely to undergo postdischarge angiography (19.2% versus 15.2%, P=.0001) and coronary angioplasty (11.6% versus 8.2%, P<.0001). This was associated with approximately $2500.00 per patient in higher cumulative costs. Despite this higher rate of procedure use, there was no association between admission to a hospital with on-site catheterization facilities and lower long-term mortality (multivariate hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.1., the hazard being associated with admission to hospitals with on-site catheterization facilities).
CONCLUSIONS: In an urban area with unconstrained patient transfer mechanisms and high overall cardiac procedure use rates, AMI patients admitted to hospitals without on-site catheterization facilities were managed with fewer procedures during hospitalization and follow-up. This more conservative treatment approach was not associated with any observed increase in long-term mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9323060     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  8 in total

1.  Temporal trends in the use of invasive cardiac procedures for non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes according to initial risk stratification.

Authors:  S Jedrzkiewicz; S G Goodman; R T Yan; R C Welsh; J Kornder; J Paul DeYoung; G C Wong; B Rose; F R Grondin; R Gallo; W Huang; J M Gore; A T Yan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  The VANQWISH Trial: support for the noninvasive strategy for risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G A Beller; K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Differences in patient survival after acute myocardial infarction by hospital capability of performing percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for regionalization.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Harlan M Krumholz; Yun Wang; Jeptha P Curtis; Saif S Rathore; Joseph S Ross; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey C Schreiner; Gregory Mulvey; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-08

4.  The association between the on-site availability of cardiac procedures and the utilization of those services for acute myocardial infarction by payer group. The National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

Authors:  J G Canto; W J Rogers; Y Zhang; J M Roseman; W J French; J M Gore; N C Chandra
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Efficacy of a 24-h primary percutaneous coronary intervention service on outcome in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

Authors:  Timm Bauer; Rainer Hoffmann; Claus Jünger; Oliver Koeth; Ralf Zahn; Anselm Gitt; Tobias Heer; Kurt Bestehorn; Jochen Senges; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Impact of cardiac service availability on case-selection for angiography and survival associated with angiography.

Authors:  Nandini Dendukuri; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Impact of on-site cardiac catheterization on resource utilization and fatal and non-fatal outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Abdul R Halabi; Christine A Beck; Mark J Eisenberg; Hugues Richard; Louise Pilote
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The association between socioeconomic position, use of revascularization procedures and five-year survival after recovery from acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Maria Rosvall; Basile Chaix; John Lynch; Martin Lindström; Juan Merlo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.