Literature DB >> 9322676

Can the combination of symptoms and endoscopy confirm the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

L Tefera1, M Fein, M P Ritter, C G Bremner, P F Crookes, J H Peters, J A Hagen, T R DeMeester.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of symptomatology and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in the diagnosis of proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We evaluated the symptoms and EGD findings of 100 consecutive patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of GERD. Patients' symptoms were scored at their first visit with a standardized symptom scoring system (grades 0-3). Grade 3 symptoms were the most severe. EGD findings were classified according to the modified Savary-Miller scale. Esophageal acid exposure was quantified using 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring; a positive composite score was considered evidence of GERD. Fifty-seven patients had positive pH scores, and 43 were negative. The combination of grade 2 or 3 heartburn and/or regurgitation with erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus on EGD had a 97 per cent specificity and 64 per cent sensitivity for accurately diagnosing GERD. It is concluded that, in the presence of moderate to severe symptoms and endoscopic injury, the diagnosis of GERD can be made without further studies. However, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring is still indicated in patients with mild typical symptoms, atypical symptoms, or when the combination of heartburn and regurgitation, regardless of their severity, occurs in the absence of severe mucosal damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  18 in total

1.  Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  G M Campos; J H Peters; T R DeMeester; S Oberg; P F Crookes; S Tan; S R DeMeester; J A Hagen; C G Bremner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08

Review 3.  [Correct diagnosis for indication in gastroesophageal reflux disease].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; E Bollschweiler; Ch Gutschow; P Malfertheiner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  M G Patti; U Diener; A Tamburini; D Molena; L W Way
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants.

Authors:  R C Fitzgerald; B A Onwuegbusi; M Bajaj-Elliott; I T Saeed; W R Burnham; M J G Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Raul Badillo; Dawn Francis
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-08-06

7.  Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jin-Yan Luo; Lei Dong; Jun Gong; Ai-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Diagnosis of esophagitis based on face recognition techniques.

Authors:  Santosh S Saraf; Gururaj R Udupi; Santosh D Hajare
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2010-05-28

Review 9.  Functional dyspepsia and nonerosive reflux disease: clinical interactions and their implications.

Authors:  John Keohane; Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-08-08

Review 10.  Short-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists and prokinetics for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms and endoscopy negative reflux disease.

Authors:  Kirsten E Sigterman; Bart van Pinxteren; Peter A Bonis; Joseph Lau; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.