Literature DB >> 9322630

Active management of labor: does it make a difference?

R Rogers1, G J Gilson, A C Miller, L E Izquierdo, L B Curet, C R Qualls.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate whether active management of labor lowers cesarean section rates, shortens the length of labor, and overcomes any negative effects of epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor. STUDY
DESIGN: We randomly assigned 405 low-risk term nulliparous patients to either an active management of labor (n = 200) or our usual care control protocol (n = 205). Patients who were undergoing active management of labor were diagnosed as being in labor on the basis of having painful palpable contractions accompanied by 80% cervical effacement, underwent early amniotomy, and were treated with high-dose oxytocin for failure to progress adequately in labor.
RESULTS: The cesarean section rate in the active management of labor group was lower than that of controls but not significantly so (active management, 7.5%; controls, 11.7%; p = 0.36). The length of labor in the active management group was shortened by 1.7 hours (from 11.4 to 9.7 hours, p = 0.001). Fifty-five percent of patients received epidural analgesics; a reduction in length of labor persisted despite the use of epidural analgesics (active management 11.2 hours vs control 13.3 hours, p = 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of active management patients were delivered by 12 hours compared with controls (75% vs 58%, p = 0.01); this difference also persisted despite the use of epidural analgesics (66% vs 51%, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing active management had shortened labors and were more likely to be delivered within 12 hours, differences that persisted despite the use of epidural analgesics. There was a trend toward a reduced rate of cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9322630     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70152-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  The active management of labor: is it worth the cost?

Authors:  M S Broder
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-04

2.  Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.

Authors:  Anke D J Smeenk; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Oxytocin augmentation of labour in women with epidural analgesia for reducing operative deliveries.

Authors:  Philippa L Costley; Christine E East
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-11

4.  Active management of labor: a cost analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R G Rogers; M O Gardner; K J Tool; J Ainsley; G Gilson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-04

5.  Comparison between amniotomy, oxytocin or both for augmentation of labor in prolonged latent phase: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zohar Nachum; Gali Garmi; Yfat Kadan; Noah Zafran; Eliezer Shalev; Raed Salim
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Effect of early amniotomy on the outcome of spontaneous labour: a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.

Authors:  Livinus N Onah; Cyril C Dim; Uchenna I Nwagha; Benjamin C Ozumba
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 7.  Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care.

Authors:  Shuqin Wei; Bi Lan Wo; Hui-Ping Qi; Hairong Xu; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Chantal Roy; William D Fraser
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 8.  Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Shantini Paranjothy; Therese Dowswell; Jane Thomas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

9.  Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians.

Authors:  Haim A Abenhaim; Alice Benjamin; Robert D Koby; Robert A Kinch; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The effect of the first vaginal birth on pelvic floor anatomy and dysfunction.

Authors:  Iva Urbankova; Klara Grohregin; Jiri Hanacek; Michal Krcmar; Jaroslav Feyereisl; Jan Deprest; Ladislav Krofta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.