Literature DB >> 9318863

Wing-beat coupling between flying locust pairs: preferred phase and lift enhancement

.   

Abstract

Pairs of locusts flying in tandem in a wind tunnel are known to couple their wing-beats intermittently. The rhythmically oscillating air flow from the front locust's wing-beat, detected by the rear individual, appears to convey the timing information for coupling. Three predictions of this arrangement were tested quantitatively in this study. (1) Given that the oscillating air flow has a wavelength of 7.5 cm, placing the rear locust 7.5 or 15 cm behind the front one should produce the same phase of coupling, whereas placing it at an intermediate distance of 11 cm should produce an opposite phase. (2) At any distance, the preferred phase at which wing-beat coupling occurs should depend, in part, on the difference in the wing-beat frequencies of the two locusts just before the coupling began. (3) At the moment that the wing-beats of the two locusts become coupled, a change should be observed consistently in the wing-beat frequency of the rear individual only. Each of these three predictions was fulfilled. We also recorded the instantaneous lift of the rear locust by tethering it to a laser torque meter. Lift varied with the phase of the wing-beats between the two locusts. For a given distance between the two locusts, lift was greater by a mean of 16 % of the locust's body mass at those phases where coupling most commonly occurred than at opposite phases. This lift effect was seen even if the wing-beats of the two locusts drifted through these preferred phases without actually coupling. These results are discussed in terms of a possible energetic advantage conferred to the rear locust by flying in tandem and by coupling its flight rhythm to the leader's wing-beat.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 9318863     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.4.1051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

Review 1.  Locust Collective Motion and Its Modeling.

Authors:  Gil Ariel; Amir Ayali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight.

Authors:  Steven J Portugal; Tatjana Y Hubel; Johannes Fritz; Stefanie Heese; Daniela Trobe; Bernhard Voelkl; Stephen Hailes; Alan M Wilson; James R Usherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Synchronization of wing beat cycle of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, by periodic light flashes.

Authors:  Fabian Schmeling; Gert Stange; Uwe Homberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The sensory feedback mechanisms enabling couples to walk synchronously: an initial investigation.

Authors:  Ari Z Zivotofsky; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.