Literature DB >> 9317404

Hindleg targeting during scratching in the locust

.   

Abstract

Intact locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) respond to tactile stimulation of their folded wings with rhythmic scratching movements of the ipsilateral hindleg that are directed towards the site of stimulation. For example, sites near the base of a wing elicit anteriorly directed scratches, whereas sites near the distal end of a wing elicit posteriorly directed scratches. Locusts also scratch in response to tactile stimulation of a wing that is held outstretched in a posture similar to that normally adopted during flight, but they fail to alter their leg targeting to compensate for this changed position of the stimulus site. Instead, they scratch at an empty point in space near the abdomen, where the stimulus site would have been if the wing was folded in the resting posture. This inappropriate scratching does not result from mechanical constraints on the hindleg's movement, from stimulation of abdominal sensory receptors, or from an absence of sensory information from the outstretched wing. It also persists when the metathoracic ganglion that controls movements of the hindlegs is isolated from the remainder of the central nervous system (CNS). Targeted scratching of sites on the wings of locusts therefore appears to be fixed relative to body coordinates and does not take into account alterations of the target wing's position.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9317404     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.200.1.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  8 in total

1.  New vistas on the initiation and maintenance of insect motor behaviors revealed by specific lesions of the head ganglia.

Authors:  Ram Gal; Frederic Libersat
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Genitalic autogrooming: a self-filling trash collection system in crickets.

Authors:  M Kumashiro; Y Tsuji; M Sakai
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-02-08

3.  Motor inhibition affects the speed but not accuracy of aimed limb movements in an insect.

Authors:  Delphine Calas-List; Anthony J Clare; Alexandra Komissarova; Thomas A Nielsen; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Grooming Behavior as a Mechanism of Insect Disease Defense.

Authors:  Marianna Zhukovskaya; Aya Yanagawa; Brian T Forschler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Grooming behavior in American cockroach is affected by novelty and odor.

Authors:  Marianna I Zhukovskaya
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-21

6.  Differential activation of serotonergic neurons during short- and long-term gregarization of desert locusts.

Authors:  Stephen M Rogers; Swidbert R Ott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Aimed limb movements in a hemimetabolous insect are intrinsically compensated for allometric wing growth by developmental mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexandra J Patel; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Passive joint forces are tuned to limb use in insects and drive movements without motor activity.

Authors:  Jan M Ache; Thomas Matheson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 10.834

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.