Literature DB >> 9316540

Balloon dilation of severe aortic stenosis in the neonate: comparison of anterograde and retrograde catheter approaches.

A G Magee1, D Nykanen, B W McCrindle, D Wax, R M Freedom, L N Benson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare anterograde and retrograde balloon dilation of severe aortic valve stenosis in neonates.
BACKGROUND: There is a high incidence of iliofemoral artery complications after retrograde balloon dilation of the aortic valve in the neonate. Therefore, a nonarterial technique of catheter access to the aortic valve would be worth exploring.
METHODS: Group 1 included 11 consecutive patients (median age 6 days, range 1 to 42; median weight 3.5 kg, range 2.16 to 4.25) undergoing attempted anterograde dilation through a femoral venous approach. Group 2 included 15 patients (median age 3 days, range 1 to 35; median weight 3.4 kg, range 2.5 to 4.4 kg) who underwent attempted retrograde dilation, including 2 in whom attempted anterograde approach had failed.
RESULTS: The valve was successfully crossed in 9 of 11 anterograde and 13 of 15 retrograde dilations. In both groups, the peak gradient across the valve decreased significantly (both p = 0.001). On echocardiography, the jet width of the aortic incompetence/ annulus diameter ratio was 0.16 +/- 0.08 (mean +/- SD) after anterograde and 0.51 +/- 0.24 after retrograde dilation (p = 0.03), possibly because of unrecognized valve leaflet perforation. Two patients in group 1 developed persistent, mild mitral insufficiency. Femoral artery thrombosis developed in one patient after anterograde dilation and in eight after retrograde dilation (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates that an anterograde approach for balloon angioplasty of severe neonatal aortic valve stenosis is feasible, achieves good hemodynamic relief and lessens morbidity compared with retrograde arterial techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9316540     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00266-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  Complex Decision Making in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory: Catheterizer, Know Thyself and the Data.

Authors:  Sophie Duignan; Aedin Ryan; Brian Burns; Damien Kenny; Colin J McMahon
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  A Comparison of Anterograde Versus Retrograde Approaches for Neonatal Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Namrita Mozumdar; Edmund Burke; Melissa Schweizer; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Hari K Narayan; Jonathan J Rome; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Left ventricle pseudoaneurysm after aortic valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Abdullah Alhuzaimi; Martin Hosking; Derek Human
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in a Premature Neonate with Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis Weighing 1493 g.

Authors:  Yin-Yu Lin; Ming-Ren Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.672

5.  Adenosine induced transient cardiac standstill in catheter interventional procedures for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  J V De Giovanni; R A Edgar; A Cranston
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Balloon Valvuloplasty for Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Experience at a Tertiary Center in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Fatme A Charafeddine; Haytham Bou Houssein; Nadine B Kibbi; Issam M El-Rassi; Anas M Tabbakh; Mohammad S Abutaqa; Ziad F Bulbul; Nour K Younis; Mariam T Arabi; Fadi F Bitar
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.