Literature DB >> 9315547

Beat-to-beat QT interval variability: novel evidence for repolarization lability in ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

R D Berger1, E K Kasper, K L Baughman, E Marban, H Calkins, G F Tomaselli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is associated with a high incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Abnormalities in repolarization of ventricular myocardium have been implicated in the development of these arrhythmias. Spatial heterogeneity in repolarization has been studied in DCM, but temporal fluctuations in repolarization in this setting have been largely ignored. We sought to test the hypothesis that beat-to-beat QT interval variability is increased in DCM patients compared with control subjects. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with ischemic and nonischemic DCM and 60 control subjects served as the study population. Beat-to-beat QT interval variability was measured by automated analysis on the basis of 256-second records of the surface ECG. A QT variability index (QTVI) was calculated for each subject as the logarithm of the ratio of normalized QT variance to heart rate variance. The coherence between heart rate and QT interval fluctuations was determined by spectral analysis. In patients, ejection fractions were assessed by echocardiography or ventriculography, and spatial QT dispersion was determined from the standard 12-lead ECG. DCM patients had greater QT variance than control subjects (60.4+/-63.1 versus 25.7+/-24.8 ms2, P<.0001) despite reduced heart rate variance (6.7+/-7.8 versus 10.5+/-10.4 bpm2, P=.01). The QTVI was higher in DCM patients than in control subjects, with a high degree of significance (-0.43+/-0.71 versus -1.29+/-0.51, P<10[-12]). QTVI did not correlate with ejection fraction or spatial QT dispersion but did depend on New York Heart Association functional class. QTVI did not differ between DCM patients with ischemic and those with nonischemic origin. Coherence between heart rate and QT interval fluctuations at physiological frequencies was lower in DCM patients compared with control subjects (0.28+/-0.14 versus 0.39+/-0.18, P<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: DCM is associated with beat-to-beat fluctuations in QT interval that are larger than normal and uncoupled from variations in heart rate. QT interval variability increases with worsening functional class but is independent of ejection fraction. These data indicate that DCM leads to temporal lability in ventricular repolarization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9315547     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  153 in total

1.  QT interval analysis on ambulatory electrocardiogram recordings: a selective beat averaging approach.

Authors:  F Badilini; P Maison-Blanche; R Childers; P Coumel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  An evaluation of the impact of gender and age on QT dispersion in healthy subjects.

Authors:  H Tran; C M White; M S Chow; J Kluger
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Body composition changes with testosterone replacement therapy following spinal cord injury and aging: A mini review.

Authors:  Tom E Nightingale; Pamela Moore; Joshua Harman; Refka Khalil; Ranjodh S Gill; Teodoro Castillo; Robert A Adler; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Sudden death in heart failure: underlying electrophysiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Subramaniam C Krishnan; Claudio D Schuger; Sidney Goldstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Beat-to-beat QT interval variability in atrial fibrillation with and without congestive cardiac failure.

Authors:  Vikram K Yeragani; Swaroop Adiga; Nagaraj Desai; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Influence of age on linear and nonlinear measures of autonomic cardiovascular modulation.

Authors:  Michael K Boettger; Steffen Schulz; Sandy Berger; Manuel Tancer; Vikram K Yeragani; Andreas Voss; Karl-Jürgen Bär
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 7.  Non-invasive electrocardiographic assessments of cardiac autonomic modulation in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  H Sharif; P J Millar; A V Incognito; D S Ditor
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Increased prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction at different degrees of glucose intolerance in the general population: the KORA S4 survey.

Authors:  Dan Ziegler; Andreas Voss; Wolfgang Rathmann; Alexander Strom; Siegfried Perz; Michael Roden; Annette Peters; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Beat-to-beat heart rate and QT variability in patients with congestive cardiac failure: blunted response to orthostatic challenge.

Authors:  Nagaraj Desai; D S Raghunandan; Mallika Mallavarapu; Ronald D Berger; Vikram K Yeragani
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 10.  [Long term electrocardiography (Holter monitoring)].

Authors:  Axel Brandes; Klaus-Peter Bethge
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.