Literature DB >> 9315012

Men's estimates of prostate cancer risk and self-reported rates of screening.

J E Ward1, A M Hughes, G H Hirst, L Winchester.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of prostate cancer screening and predictors of men's participation in this screening in the light of national recommendations against prostate cancer screening
DESIGN: Community-based study (computer-assisted telephone survey).
SETTING: Central Sydney Area Health Service. PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected men aged 40-80 years.
RESULTS: 340 men participated (65% response rate). While the true lifetime (0-74 years) risk of developing or dying from prostate cancer is reported to be one in 18 (6%) and one in 65 (1.5%), respectively, 37% of respondents thought that at least one in five men (20%) would develop prostate cancer before the age of 75 years and 11% that one in five (20%) would die from it. Twenty-two per cent of men aged 50 years or over had been screened for prostate cancer within the previous 12 months. Ever worrying about prostate cancer and bothersome urinary symptoms independently predicted the probability of screening within the previous year. Sociodemographic characteristics such as age, occupation and country of birth were not associated with screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Public health initiatives to discourage prostate cancer screening should focus particularly on men with bothersome urinary symptoms and those who worry about prostate cancer. Accurate information about the low risks of dying from prostate cancer needs to be communicated, and the speculative nature of current evidence in support of screening as a means of reducing this risk should be emphasised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9315012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

Review 1.  The role of anxiety in prostate carcinoma: a structured review of the literature.

Authors:  William Dale; Pinar Bilir; Misop Han; David Meltzer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Factors influencing men's decisions regarding prostate cancer screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Eric K Shaw; John G Scott
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-10

3.  Perceived risk and worry about prostate cancer: a proposed conceptual model.

Authors:  Julie B Schnur; Terry A DiLorenzo; Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Gary Winkel; Simon J Hall; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.104

4.  Lifetime risk and projected population prevalence of diabetes.

Authors:  D J Magliano; J E Shaw; S M Shortreed; W J Nusselder; D Liew; E L M Barr; P Z Zimmet; A Peeters
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Why men with prostate cancer want wider access to prostate specific antigen testing: qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland; Sasha Shepperd; Rachel Miller; Andrew Herxheimer; Ann McPherson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05

6.  A community study using specified and unspecified scenarios to investigate men's views about PSA screening.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Applying strategies from libertarian paternalism to decision making for prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening.

Authors:  David C Wheeler; Konrad M Szymanski; Amanda Black; David E Nelson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Representations and coverage of non-English-speaking immigrants and multicultural issues in three major Australian health care publications.

Authors:  Pamela W Garrett; Hugh G Dickson; Anna Klinken Whelan; Linda Whyte
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2010-01-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.