Literature DB >> 9314869

Randomised trial of two regimens of chemotherapy in operable osteosarcoma: a study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

R L Souhami1, A W Craft, J W Van der Eijken, M Nooij, D Spooner, V H Bramwell, R Wierzbicki, A J Malcolm, A Kirkpatrick, B M Uscinska, M Van Glabbeke, D Machin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A previous trial by the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) suggested that a short intensive chemotherapy regimen with doxorubicin and cisplatin might produce survival of operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma similar to that obtained with complex and longer-duration drug regimens based on the widely used T10 multi-drug protocol. We undertook a randomised multicentre trial to compare these two approaches.
METHODS: 407 patients with operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma were randomly assigned the two-drug regimen (six cycles [18 weeks] of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or a multi-drug regimen (preoperatively vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, and doxorubicin; postoperatively bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin; this protocol took 44 weeks). Surgery was scheduled for week 9 for the two-drug group and week 7 for the multi-drug group. Analyses of survival and progression-free survival were by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Of 407 randomised patients, 391 were eligible and have been followed up for at least 4 years (median 5-6 years). Toxic effects were qualitatively similar with the two regimens. However, 188 (94%) of 199 patients completed the six cycles of two-drug treatment, whereas only 97 (51%) of 192 completed 18 or more of the 20 cycles of the multi-drug regimen. The proportion showing a good histopathological response (> 90% tumour necrosis) to preoperative chemotherapy was about 29% with both regimens and was strongly predictive of survival. Overall survival was 65% at 3 years and 55% at 5 years in both groups (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.69-1.27]). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 44% in both groups (hazard ratio 1.01 [0.77-1.33]).
INTERPRETATION: We found no difference in survival between the two-drug and multi-drug regimens in operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma. The two-drug regimen is shorter in duration and better tolerated, and is therefore the preferred treatment. However, 5-year survival is still unsatisfactory and new approaches to treatment, such as dose intensification, are needed to improve results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314869     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02307-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  71 in total

1.  Letter regarding Zhang et al. entitled "Systematic review of high-dose and standard-dose chemotherapies in the treatment of primary well-differentiated osteosarcoma".

Authors:  Ke-Wei Zhu; Wan-Chun Wang; Ren Wu; Ding Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-21

2.  Prognosticating metastatic osteosarcoma treated with uniform chemotherapy protocol without high dose methotrexate and delayed metastasectomy: a single center experience of 102 patients.

Authors:  V Nataraj; S Rastogi; S A Khan; M C Sharma; S Agarwala; S Vishnubhatla; S Bakhshi
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Understanding micrometastatic disease and Anoikis resistance in ewing family of tumors and osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Sandra J Strauss; Tony Ng; Ariadna Mendoza-Naranjo; Jeremy Whelan; Poul H B Sorensen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-17

4.  Survival from high-grade localised extremity osteosarcoma: combined results and prognostic factors from three European Osteosarcoma Intergroup randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J S Whelan; R C Jinks; A McTiernan; M R Sydes; J M Hook; L Trani; B Uscinska; V Bramwell; I J Lewis; M A Nooij; M van Glabbeke; R J Grimer; P C W Hogendoorn; A H M Taminiau; H Gelderblom
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Pharmacogenomics of second-line drugs used for treatment of unresponsive or relapsed osteosarcoma patients.

Authors:  Claudia M Hattinger; Serena Vella; Elisa Tavanti; Marilù Fanelli; Piero Picci; Massimo Serra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Establishment of human osteosarcoma cell lines with high metastatic potential to lungs and their utilities for therapeutic studies on metastatic osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Kenji Kimura; Tetsuhiro Nakano; Yong-Bum Park; Masachika Tani; Hiroyuki Tsuda; Yasuo Beppu; Hideshige Moriya; Jun Yokota
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  The impact of pathological fractures on therapy outcome in patients with primary malignant bone tumours.

Authors:  Babak Moradi; Anita Zahlten-Hinguranage; Burkhard Lehner; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Effect of chemotherapy on segmental bone healing enhanced by rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Pablo Gomez; Jeffrey Stack; George Oji; James Martin; Douglas C Fredericks; Joseph A Buckwalter
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Emerging chemotherapeutic strategies and the role of treatment stratification in Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Beatrice M Seddon; Jeremy S Whelan
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  Prognostic factors in the survival of patients diagnosed with primary non-metastatic osteosarcoma with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rosalvo Zósimo Bispo Júnior; Olavo Pires de Camargo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.