Literature DB >> 9314365

Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation for the treatment of infertility: changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes.

R D Shlansky-Goldberg1, K N VanArsdalen, C M Rutter, M C Soulen, Z J Haskal, R A Baum, D C Redd, C Cope, M J Pentecost.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the success of percutaneous varicocele embolization to surgical ligation with regard to changes in semen characteristics and pregnancy outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Infertility records from 346 men who underwent correction of their varicocele for infertility (surgical ligation 149; embolization 197) were reviewed retrospectively. Preprocedural and postprocedural semen analyses and pregnancy outcomes were obtained with use of chart and telephone follow-up.
RESULTS: In men who successfully impregnated their partners, there were significant improvements in sperm density, percent total improvement, motility, and progression. Postprocedural (embolization vs surgery) percentage increases in seminal parameters were density, 156.8% versus 138.5%; total, 168.8% versus 157.91%; and motility, 2.7% versus 3.2%. The percent of individuals who had a change in sperm progression was 31% versus 41%. There was no statistical difference between the techniques based on t tests. The pregnancy rates were similar for the two groups, 39% and 34% for embolization and surgery, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant statistical difference in seminal values or pregnancy outcome between the two techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314365     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70657-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  20 in total

Review 1.  Management strategies for male factor infertility.

Authors:  Gerhard Haidl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Follow-up of varicocele treated with percutaneous retrograde sclerotherapy: technical, clinical and seminal aspects.

Authors:  C Di Bisceglie; R Fornengo; M Grosso; C Gazzera; A Mancini; B Andriani; F Lanfranco; L Brocato; G Gandini; C Manieri
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Transcatheter therapeutic embolization of genitourinary pathology.

Authors:  J F Ward; T E Velling
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

4.  Percutaneous varicocele embolization.

Authors:  J Robert D Beecroft
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Antegrade pampiniform plexus venography in recurrent varicocele: Case report and anatomy review.

Authors:  Vyacheslav Gendel; Ihab Haddadin; John L Nosher
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-28

Review 6.  Imaging and interventional therapy for varicoceles.

Authors:  No Kwak; David Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Varicocele: A Review.

Authors:  Brian F Baigorri; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis reveals microsurgical varicocele repair is superior to percutaneous embolization in the treatment of male infertility.

Authors:  Jason Ronald Kovac; Jake Fantus; Larry I Lipshultz; Marc Anthony Fischer; Zachery Klinghoffer
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Gonadal vein embolization: treatment of varicocele and pelvic congestion syndrome.

Authors:  Mark A Bittles; Eric K Hoffer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.513

10.  Percutaneous retrograde varicocele embolisation using tungsten embolisation coils: a five year audit.

Authors:  S R Keoghane; L Jones; M P Wright; J Kabala
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.