BACKGROUND: Comparison of trauma survival rates between institutions and reference data bases is hampered by different injury severity mixes. To overcome this, a standardized comparison using a stratified W statistic (Ws) has been proposed. Ws enables comparisons but does not represent actual survival rates at an institution. METHOD, DISCUSSION, AND RESULTS: This discussion paper uses, as an example, data from 632 patients with blunt injuries treated by an integrated trauma system comprising a helicopter emergency medical service and the Royal London Hospital. Using the United Kingdom Major Trauma Outcome Study as a reference data set, Ws is calculated and its usefulness discussed. The problem of overprediction of survival is discussed. A modification of the Ws method is used to allow for this and to estimate the actual survival rate. CONCLUSION: Ws is useful for comparison between centers. Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology overpredicts survival in certain probability of survival intervals. Adjustment can be made to estimate the actual survival rate. When applied to an integrated trauma system, such adjustments demonstrate overall improved survival, most noticeable in a more severely injured subgroup.
BACKGROUND: Comparison of trauma survival rates between institutions and reference data bases is hampered by different injury severity mixes. To overcome this, a standardized comparison using a stratified W statistic (Ws) has been proposed. Ws enables comparisons but does not represent actual survival rates at an institution. METHOD, DISCUSSION, AND RESULTS: This discussion paper uses, as an example, data from 632 patients with blunt injuries treated by an integrated trauma system comprising a helicopter emergency medical service and the Royal London Hospital. Using the United Kingdom Major Trauma Outcome Study as a reference data set, Ws is calculated and its usefulness discussed. The problem of overprediction of survival is discussed. A modification of the Ws method is used to allow for this and to estimate the actual survival rate. CONCLUSION: Ws is useful for comparison between centers. Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology overpredicts survival in certain probability of survival intervals. Adjustment can be made to estimate the actual survival rate. When applied to an integrated trauma system, such adjustments demonstrate overall improved survival, most noticeable in a more severely injured subgroup.
Authors: Leontien M Sturms; Josephine M Hoogeveen; Saskia Le Cessie; Peter E Schenck; Paul V M Pahlplatz; Mike Hogervorst; Gerrolt N Jukema Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2006-05-13 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Ida Füglistaler-Montali; Corinna Attenberger; Philipp Füglistaler; Augustinus L Jacob; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Leonie de Munter; Nancy C W Ter Bogt; Suzanne Polinder; Charlie A Sewalt; Ewout W Steyerberg; Mariska A C de Jongh Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tim Nutbeam; Rob Fenwick; Jason Smith; Omar Bouamra; Lee Wallis; Willem Stassen Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Kjetil G Ringdal; Timothy J Coats; Rolf Lefering; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Petter Andreas Steen; Olav Røise; Lauri Handolin; Hans Morten Lossius Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 2.953