Literature DB >> 9312035

Bacteriophage phi29 DNA replication arrest caused by codirectional collisions with the transcription machinery.

M Elías-Arnanz1, M Salas.   

Abstract

The consequences on replication of collisions between phi29 DNA polymerase, a monomeric replicase endowed with strand displacement capacity, and the transcription machinery have been studied in vitro. Codirectional collisions with stalled transcription ternary complexes at four different promoters in the phi29 genome were found to block replication fork progression. Upon collision, the DNA polymerase remained on the template and was able to resume elongation once the RNA polymerase was allowed to move. Collisions with RNA polymerase molecules moving in the same direction also interfered with replication, causing a decrease in the replication rate. These results lead to the proposal that in bacteriophage phi29 a transcription complex physically blocks the progression of a replication fork. We suggest that temporal regulation of transcription and the low probability that the replication and transcription processes colocalize in vivo contribute to achieving minimal interference between the two events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9312035      PMCID: PMC1170208          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/16.18.5775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  35 in total

1.  DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription.

Authors:  A M Deshpande; C S Newlon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Relating structure to function in phi29 DNA polymerase.

Authors:  L Blanco; M Salas
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Modulation of in vivo and in vitro transcription of bacteriophage phi 29 early genes.

Authors:  H R Whiteley; W D Ramey; G B Spiegelman; R D Holder
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  In vivo transcription of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA: transcription termination.

Authors:  I Barthelemy; M Salas; R P Mellado
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  A replication fork barrier at the 3' end of yeast ribosomal RNA genes.

Authors:  B J Brewer; W L Fangman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Organization of replication of ribosomal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M H Linskens; J A Huberman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  When polymerases collide: replication and the transcriptional organization of the E. coli chromosome.

Authors:  B J Brewer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  In vitro transcription of bacteriophage phi 29 DNA: inhibition of early promoters by the viral replication protein p6.

Authors:  I Barthelemy; R P Mellado; M Salas
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Initiation of phage phi 29 DNA replication in vitro: formation of a covalent complex between the terminal protein, p3, and 5'-dAMP.

Authors:  M A Peñalva; M Salas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Replication of phage phi 29 DNA with purified terminal protein and DNA polymerase: synthesis of full-length phi 29 DNA.

Authors:  L Blanco; M Salas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Replication-transcription conflicts in bacteria.

Authors:  Houra Merrikh; Yan Zhang; Alan D Grossman; Jue D Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Mechanisms of transcription-replication collisions in bacteria.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Impairment of replication fork progression mediates RNA polII transcription-associated recombination.

Authors:  Félix Prado; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Transcription regulatory elements are punctuation marks for DNA replication.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Daniel Castro Roa; Evgeny Nudler; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genome-wide coorientation of replication and transcription reduces adverse effects on replication in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Jue D Wang; Melanie B Berkmen; Alan D Grossman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Replication fork stalling at natural impediments.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Mirkin; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anna Azvolinsky; Paul G Giresi; Jason D Lieb; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Molecular traffic jams on DNA.

Authors:  Ilya J Finkelstein; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

9.  RecQ and RecG helicases have distinct roles in maintaining the stability of polypurine.polypyrimidine sequences.

Authors:  Bradley P Dixon; Lu Lu; Albert Chu; John J Bissler
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Back to the origin: reconsidering replication, transcription, epigenetics, and cell cycle control.

Authors:  Adam G Evertts; Hilary A Coller
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2012-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.