D Andriole1, K Ryan, D Haire-Joshu. 1. Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. andrioled@msnotes.wustl.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare U.S. medical student Match results in 1996 for 19 categorical residency positions by specialty with those of the overall Match reported by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). METHOD: Data for the numbers of "active" senior U.S. student applicants (those who submitted rank lists), the numbers of U.S. seniors matched, and the numbers of unfilled positions for 19 specialties were obtained from a variety of sources. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare Match results for each independent specialty with the overall Match results. The level for statistical significant was set at p < .005. RESULTS: Eight specialties were identified as significantly more competitive than the overall Match process for both the percentage of U.S. seniors who successfully matched in that specialty and the ratio of unmatched U.S. senior applicants to unfilled categorical positions. Five specialties were identified as significantly less competitive for these two measures. Six specialties showed no significant difference in the percentages of U.S. students matching, but for three of these specialties there were more unmatched students than unfilled categorical positions. CONCLUSION: U.S. medical student Match results for categorical residency positions for different specialties vary significantly from the overall Match process. This information can be used in counseling senior medical students on their specialty selection and the residency application process.
PURPOSE: To compare U.S. medical student Match results in 1996 for 19 categorical residency positions by specialty with those of the overall Match reported by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). METHOD: Data for the numbers of "active" senior U.S. student applicants (those who submitted rank lists), the numbers of U.S. seniors matched, and the numbers of unfilled positions for 19 specialties were obtained from a variety of sources. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare Match results for each independent specialty with the overall Match results. The level for statistical significant was set at p < .005. RESULTS: Eight specialties were identified as significantly more competitive than the overall Match process for both the percentage of U.S. seniors who successfully matched in that specialty and the ratio of unmatched U.S. senior applicants to unfilled categorical positions. Five specialties were identified as significantly less competitive for these two measures. Six specialties showed no significant difference in the percentages of U.S. students matching, but for three of these specialties there were more unmatched students than unfilled categorical positions. CONCLUSION: U.S. medical student Match results for categorical residency positions for different specialties vary significantly from the overall Match process. This information can be used in counseling senior medical students on their specialty selection and the residency application process.